# Community Staking Module Committee

**URL:** <https://research.lido.fi/t/community-staking-module-committee/8333>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Created:** [September 10, 2024, 10:15am UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/community-staking-module-committee/8333 "2024-09-10T10:15:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 21

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![madlabman](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/madlabman/32/3436_2.png) [@madlabman](https://research.lido.fi/u/madlabman)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2025, 7:16am UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/community-staking-module-committee/8333/21 "2025-07-03T07:16:05Z")

</div>

GM!

Here is a quarterly update from the CSM multisig committee for Q2 2025. During Q2 2025, no incidents were identified that resulted in reported MEV stealing by the committee.

There were 2 incidents that led to a block being proposed with a null fee recipient.

Node Operator 91 [self-reported](https://research.lido.fi/t/proposed-a-block-with-a-null-fee-recipient/10120) an issue related to a client. The block reward was [compensated](https://etherscan.io/tx/0x4c94ee35f62ec8a95a386e1266ab35aa2baa24828a7de1dbe90b94002c488ee2) directly to the Lido EL Rewards Vault.

Node Operator 57 [self-reported](https://research.lido.fi/t/proposed-block-with-null-fee-recipient/10259) a misconfiguration issue and [compensated](https://etherscan.io/tx/0xaae0556dd3aa6a4f5cf92119ca943901ce1622bf676250801302c9dbae4a2e4e) the block reward directly to the Lido EL Rewards Vault.

In both cases, the committee members agreed that there was no malicious intent and no additional fee was necessary.

---

_[View the full topic](https://research.lido.fi/t/community-staking-module-committee/8333)._