# Increasing max APR sanity check for Oracle Lido report

**URL:** <https://research.lido.fi/t/increasing-max-apr-sanity-check-for-oracle-lido-report/3205>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Created:** [November 9, 2022, 9:01pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/increasing-max-apr-sanity-check-for-oracle-lido-report/3205 "2022-11-09T21:01:21Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![TheDZhon](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/thedzhon/32/800_2.png) [@TheDZhon](https://research.lido.fi/u/TheDZhon)\
**Post date:** [November 10, 2022, 6:03am UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/increasing-max-apr-sanity-check-for-oracle-lido-report/3205/4 "2022-11-10T06:03:59Z")

</div>

I am pro this proposal.

MEV amount has been sloping upward since yesterday compared to all of the days since the Merge, see [Lido post Merge protocol APR: Consensus and Execution Layer Rewards](https://dune.com/LidoAnalytical/lido-execution-layer-rewards).

Looks like we didn’t have a regression test to re-ensure the aforementioned 10% yearly threshold ([[1]](https://docs.lido.fi/contracts/lido-oracle#sanity-checks-the-oracles-reports-by-configurable-values), [[2]](https://github.com/lidofinance/lido-improvement-proposals/blob/develop/LIPS/lip-2.md#sanity-checks-the-oracles-reports-by-configurable-values)) at the moment of the [Merge-ready protocol upgrade](https://research.lido.fi/t/announcement-merge-ready-protocol-service-pack/2184). That’s how it flew _under the radar_.

---

_[View the full topic](https://research.lido.fi/t/increasing-max-apr-sanity-check-for-oracle-lido-report/3205)._