Having a different assessment of the risks, their likelihood, impact, identifying and examining other risks – largely unaddressed by the wider community , often because of how opaque and “non-memetic” they are – and how they may be managed is not the same thing as lack of self-awareness.
I think the Lido community and the DAO have put a lot of thought and effort into identifying, researching, analyzing, publicly acknowledging, discussing at length, and offering insights into how these (and other) risks might actually materialize (or not). Examples include:
- the self-limiting discussion from a year ago,
- my analysis of general risks around LSPs and staking and how self-limiting actually pushes other very serious risks under the surface
- sacha’s recent point by point analysis of danny’s criticisms
- pushing forward in depth analysis and identification and measuring of on-chain censorship
- countless conversations on twitter, at conferences, in person, etc.
I welcome engaging on the substance here vs broad strokes generalizations, so can we get to that instead?