I propose considering the option of allowing users to place pending withdrawal NFTs in the veto signaling escrow
this is really interesting. consequences obviously need to be analyzed
in the event of disagreement with DAO decisions, foot voting mechanics remain a more optimal choice for stETH holders than engaging in a negotiation process
not sure i buy this. i don’t think you can confidently make an absolute statement like this that applies to all, or even the majority, of cases. will likely be case dependent
In another potential scenario, a DAO proposal accumulates enough stETH to initiate the rage quit phase, signifying a significant part of users choosing to exit the protocol… n such critical situations, the global settlement mechanics (or a similar mechanism safeguarding all users) offer better protection for stETH holders than a local settlement.
again, not sure i buy this. whether this sentiment should be applicable globally depends on veto thresholds and concentration/distribution of vetoing stake imo
The malicious proposal is discarded. In this case, all LDO holders who voted for the harmful proposal undergo a measure that deprives them of their voting power. After this measure is taken, the protocol returns to its regular operations. The specifics of implementing such an approach necessitate additional research.
really dislike this. this has 2nd order consequences on voting participation and outcomes imho. you inevitably push people to vote for the status quo / less controversial thing
The latter option seems preferable, introducing the “skin in the game” concept… This flexibility empowers honest LDO holders to respond promptly if the veto begins accumulating power, thereby safeguarding their voting power.
this sounds nice in theory. but cognitive burden on voters is real and should not be discounted. also not clear how this plays out in a world where a substantial amount of LDO is delegated
If malicious actors capture the DAO, the veto committee can cancel harmful DAO decisions and exclude LDO holders who supported these proposals from the voting process.
this is true even if malicious actors don’t capture the DAO and even if the decision isn’t harmful. a lot can go wrong here