# LIP-28 Dual Governance

**URL:** <https://research.lido.fi/t/lip-28-dual-governance/10032>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Created:** [May 8, 2025, 6:53pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/lip-28-dual-governance/10032 "2025-05-08T18:53:20Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 5

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lanski](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/lanski/32/4846_2.png) [@Lanski](https://research.lido.fi/u/Lanski)\
**Post date:** [May 11, 2025, 10:31am UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/lip-28-dual-governance/10032/5 "2025-05-11T10:31:45Z")

</div>

Has been in the making for a long time, it’s complex to implement and yet it’s extremely simple to understand:

- signal your disagreement.
- if enough disagreement is shown (first seal), timelock increases so others can disagree as well.
- if more disagreement is signaled (second seal), timelock is permanent until all those who disagree have exited so they are not affected by the governance change.
- After everyone that disagrees leaves, governance can proceed.

Good job guys, can’t wait to see it implemented to protect Ethereum, stETH holders, and keep LDO holders and delegates in check.

---

_[View the full topic](https://research.lido.fi/t/lip-28-dual-governance/10032)._