# Pol Lanski Delegate Thread

**URL:** <https://research.lido.fi/t/pol-lanski-delegate-thread/8155>\
**Category:** Delegate Platform\
**Created:** [August 19, 2024, 2:20pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/pol-lanski-delegate-thread/8155 "2024-08-19T14:20:55Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 33

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Lanski](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/lanski/32/4846_2.png) [@Lanski](https://research.lido.fi/u/Lanski)\
**Post date:** [July 18, 2026, 1:57pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/pol-lanski-delegate-thread/8155/33 "2026-07-18T13:57:11Z")

</div>

## [1. 0x02 CSM: New Permissionless Module Launch](https://snapshot.box/#/s:lido-snapshot.eth/proposal/0xed2a3b1f796cefdd531abe14ba01363b2da7887434cefdd54ba71ffb6dff59a7)

Forum post [here](https://research.lido.fi/t/0x02-csm-landscape/11697)

### Vote: For

### Rationale:

The previous CSM becomes CSM 0x01 and a **new** module joins the party: CSM 0x02. The reason for 2 CSModules is because supporting the two types of validators (0x01 and 0x02) is a nightmare.  
This comes with a 2/8% split between N.O. and DAO, making it fairly profitable for the DAO and at the same time gives the capital multiplier for N.O.s that made CSM so attractive in the first place.

20% combined stake share cap for 0x01 + 0x02 CSM is, I hope, part of the conservative approach to new modules, and I expect to see the % rise.

## [2. Adopt the CMv2 Penalty Framework](https://snapshot.box/#/s:lido-snapshot.eth/proposal/0xa4179234377bab093a8ee46da0f430d51bb343d00ca74ce8bf1d7d8cdb0db9dd)

Forum post [here](https://research.lido.fi/t/penalty-framework-cmv2/11732)

### Vote: For

### Rationale:

Excellent work again from the NOM team to keep adjusting the accountability framework for NOs that goes with modifying the terms of the CM. No notes.

## [Vote #203](https://dao.lido.fi/vote/203)

Eyy! New UI! Nice.  
LIP-33 and LIP-35 being implemented on-chain. Audits in the Vote page available for everyone to see. Best practises in on-chain parameter upgrades.

---

_[View the full topic](https://research.lido.fi/t/pol-lanski-delegate-thread/8155)._