# Proposal: Wind Down the Simple DVT Module Regular Clusters

**URL:** https://research.lido.fi/t/proposal-wind-down-the-simple-dvt-module-regular-clusters/11571
**Category:** Proposals
**Created:** [May 18, 2026, 4:22pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/proposal-wind-down-the-simple-dvt-module-regular-clusters/11571 "2026-05-18T16:22:14Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 7

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![remus](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/remus/32/5044_2.png) [@remus](https://research.lido.fi/u/remus)
#### Post date: [May 26, 2026, 1:34pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/proposal-wind-down-the-simple-dvt-module-regular-clusters/11571/7 "2026-05-26T13:34:54Z")

</div>

@ColinkaMalinka 1. Yes, after the transition from the LNOSG, the SDVT-related operator rotation processes fall under the CMC. Historically, all operators in the module have been considered for the backup list, based on the criteria I’ve mentioned above. _More details on the CMC \<\> SDVT Module operations [in the forum post](https://research.lido.fi/t/proposal-transition-the-lnosg-into-the-cmc/11341#p-24720-simple-dvt-sdvt-module-operations-9)._  
2. Operators from the ‘Community Staker’ category have been treated as separate participants when onboarding, so I believe that the same approach will continue to apply.  
3. Those 23 rotations mentioned in the proposal happened since launch, across both SSV and Obol clusters, but there is no fixed cadence for rotations, as they are driven by operators withdrawing from clusters. The CMC also has the ability to add or remove participants using the backup list or the broader operator pool, although I do not currently expect significant changes to SDVT clusters.

Thank you!

---

_[View the full topic](https://research.lido.fi/t/proposal-wind-down-the-simple-dvt-module-regular-clusters/11571)._