# Redirecting incoming revenue stream from insurance fund to DAO treasury

**URL:** <https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528>\
**Category:** Proposals\
**Created:** [July 5, 2022, 12:16pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528 "2022-07-05T12:16:34Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Izzy](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/izzy/32/320_2.png) [@Izzy](https://research.lido.fi/u/Izzy)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2022, 2:05pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528/23 "2022-07-21T14:05:28Z")

</div>

I think we probably need a special section or page on a per-protocol basis, at the very least starting with a Q&A block in the FAQs under e.g. [stake.lido.fi](http://stake.lido.fi), [polygon.lido.fi](http://polygon.lido.fi), etc, since it’s possible that there will be have different approaches for all of the different stAsset products.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![McNut](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/mcnut/32/4090_2.png) [@McNut](https://research.lido.fi/u/McNut)\
**Post date:** [July 21, 2022, 2:17pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528/24 "2022-07-21T14:17:28Z")

</div>

I agree that seems like a logical location. I would support its own sub section so its not lost in the long list of risks. Maybe a section like can I mitigate or reduce risk? Here we could call out the insurance fund and the 3rd party options. Maybe an example quantifying the risk such as we have in this thread, that dives into the individual impact a staker might experience using nice round numbers such as 100 ETH and the most likely slashing impact.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zuzu\_eeka](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/zuzu_eeka/32/1157_2.png) [@zuzu\_eeka](https://research.lido.fi/u/zuzu_eeka)\
**Post date:** [September 29, 2022, 2:57pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528/25 "2022-09-29T14:57:02Z")

</div>

Finally we have updates on this topic.

Insurance Fund contract successfully deployed at [Lido: DAO Insurance Fund | Address 0x8B3f33234ABD88493c0Cd28De33D583B70beDe35 | Etherscan](https://etherscan.io/address/0x8B3f33234ABD88493c0Cd28De33D583B70beDe35) 🥳

Also next Tuesday, October 4, we plan to launch an Aragon vote to transfer 5’466.46 wstETH (worth of stETH) nominated in stETH from the DAO Treasury to the new Insurance Fund contract.  
The amount of 5’466.46 wstETH consists of two parts:

1. 4’546.38 wstETH is the amount that the Treasury had at the moment of redirecting revenue stream from Insurance fund to the DAO Treasury

> [@zuzu\_eeka](#):
>
> 4 546,38 wstETH to be transferred to the Insurance fund after it is moved to a separate address

1. 920.08 wstETH is the amount that was used to cover the latest RCC and operating expenses and it was assumed that this amount should be returned to the Insurance fund

> [@kethfinex](#):
>
> 920.08 wstETH will also be added to the insurance fund that was used to cover the latest RCC and operating expenses (OpEx)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zuzu\_eeka](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/zuzu_eeka/32/1157_2.png) [@zuzu\_eeka](https://research.lido.fi/u/zuzu_eeka)\
**Post date:** [October 4, 2022, 2:12pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528/27 "2022-10-04T14:12:04Z")

</div>

🚍 The Omnibus vote has started! The main phase, in which you can vote For and Against, will last until 2 PM UTC Thursday, October 6th.

Please cast your votes!  
➡ [Lido DAO Voting UI](https://vote.lido.fi/vote/140)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![zuzu\_eeka](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/zuzu_eeka/32/1157_2.png) [@zuzu\_eeka](https://research.lido.fi/u/zuzu_eeka)\
**Post date:** [October 18, 2022, 2:18pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528/28 "2022-10-18T14:18:01Z")

</div>

The previous omnibus did not reach a quorum, so we decided to restart this vote again.  
The main phase, in which you can vote For and Against, will last until 2 PM UTC Thursday, October 20th.  
[https://vote.lido.fi/vote/141](https://vote.lido.fi/vote/141)  
Please vote! 🚌

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![logach](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/research.lido.fi/logach/32/806_2.png) [@logach](https://research.lido.fi/u/logach)\
**Post date:** [October 21, 2022, 2:24pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528/29 "2022-10-21T14:24:57Z")

</div>

[Voting #141](https://vote.lido.fi/vote/141) is over 🏁 and passed, phew! 👍 (7.2% pro)

[Previous page](https://research.lido.fi/t/redirecting-incoming-revenue-stream-from-insurance-fund-to-dao-treasury/2528.md?page=1)
