I find the suggested approach prudent and innovative, not sacrificing the DAO’s approved long-term Purpose, Mission, and Vision.
I personally strongly support this point because the LRT’s risk surface currently has many blank spots. As a consequence, community awareness should still evolve and be enriched with more meaningful data, considerations, and research results on risk exposure, even for the most prominent LRT products. That’s why it makes sense to bridge the opportunity for tuning the individual risk/reward profile rather than terraforming the whole landscape of the staking product, shattering the design assumptions and expectations set a long time before.