[reWARDS] December ‘22 Budget

Welcome to December’s reWARDS budget.

Details are below as usual. This proposal will be open for community feedback for 3 days. After which, if there is no contention, it will be acted upon.

If there are budget updates throughout the month, they will be posted under this topic for transparency.

The sections are as follows:

  • Operational Updates and Topics
  • Budget and breakdown
  • Reasoning
  • New experiments

Operational Updates and Topics:

  • We’re still providing a higher level table of networks’ allocations and a .csv file with the specific pools/integrations by network and platform. No updates in the general structure this month as there have been no changes chains-wise.
  • Last month we shared that a public dashboard monitoring Lido’s reWARDS multisigs would be made available. It is now here, in the public LidoAnalytical dune. Transactions are labeled to the best of our ability to make it easier for community auditoring!

Budget and Breakdown

The December budget calls for 3,471,050 LDO. (Actual 3,155,500 + 10% buffer)

Remaining balances estimated at EOM (unspent and left in the different multisigs by the last day of November and usable for November’s spend, rounded to thousands):

  • Ethereum: 217k LDO
  • Solana: 239.5k LDO
  • Polygon: 40k LDO
  • Moonbeam (Polkadot): 46k LDO
  • Moonriver (Kusama): 10k LDO
  • Arbitrum: 52.5k LDO
  • Optimism: 40k LDO
  • Total: 645k LDO

Requested budget 2,827,000 (Budget Call - Remaining, rounded)

To be distributed across the following pools and networks with the buffer of 316,500 LDO held for unaccounted needs during the month.

The colors correspond to an increase or decrease of LDO for the month.
The detailed .csv file is provided here.



In November we kicked off wstETH to stablecoins liquidity on mainnet, under a partnership with KyberSwap. The results of that can be tracked in real time in this new dashboard.

On another note, with the extreme situations we saw in the crypto markets in November, our main (w)stETH-ETH pools on mainnet were hit due to reasons completely unrelated to Lido. This is, of course, a situation we’re very closely monitoring.

Additionally, November ended up being a month with three balancer hidden hand bribing rounds, which was the reason for the actual spend here being considerably higher than what had been budgeted for (still well under the allowed buffer).


The Solana DeFi ecosystem was obviously hit very hard over the past few weeks. As such the Lido on Solana team acted quickly to manage incentives spend through this month. A list of their actions reWARDS-wise was posted here.

This was the main reason for the drastic reductions in both actual and requested incentives on the solana side.


We have the first lending pool with wstDOT as collateral launched on Midas.

LDO leftovers are due to rewards amounts being adjusted accordingly with partner protocol’s rewards and target TVLs for the period.


No additional protocols to be launched for now, so there were leftover incentives here.

December budget has Solarbeam refills both for December and January to adjust operations timing.


In December we had a planned 22.7% incentive emission decrease compared to November and 36.5% cumulative by EOY. Due to the market state, aftermath of several black swan events and net stake withdrawals we further reduced the emission to 36.64% which counts for total of 47.15% decrease by EOY. This is essential and important step for Lido sustainability and macro plan of Lido wide incentive reduction.

We also worked on current pool and vault optimisation and will continue to do so this month. Optimisation is in correlation with incentives where we’ve retired underperforming positions.

This month Beefy will have concentrated liquidity vaults and we will open new markets there on UniV3 and support our Kyber depth.

In early December general Aave wMatic parameter optimisations are going live to reduce borrow APY and we will finally be able to utilise advanced DeFi strategies.

By that time we will also be able to incentivise lending side on Aave for stMatic. Development is done and snapshot vote can be seen here.

Considering 40k leftover, 20k was reserved for Aave which was explained above / not launched.
20k was reduced as part of the incentives winding down movement.

Arbitrum & Optimism

In December we anticipate a new round of integrations on Ethereum L2 networks. Some of the integrations that were slated for November were not accomplished, due to technical and market condition related blockers. Most of these should move forward in December - and the LDO that was allocated to related incentivisation campaigns remains in the Lido team multisigs.

We’ve built and made public two dashboards showing pools, integrations and rewards performances on both Arbitrum and Optimism.

New Experiments:

We’ve continued to reduce and optimize overall incentives spend across most networks Lido is in.
Big improvements have been made which can be seen from the overall budget requests as well as from the transparency provided. There’s, however, still a lot of room for improvement in how we optimize spend, and it is still a work in progress.

In November we experimented with vlAURA bribes, with the new USDC-wstETH pool aforementioned, and are actively exploring 5 to 7 ways of incentivizing new types of liquidity (concentrated and/or stablecoins). Additionally, sizeable reductions and optimizations in incentives have been made across the non-ETH Lido on X reWARDS programs (which can be compared with previous budgets).

We have also worked on the process of how the committee makes decisions on new incentives opportunities and inbound requests.

As always, we appreciate all community feedback on this!


There should be a clearer strategy on what the rewards are trying to accomplish, spending so much in KSM rewards is burning money on fire. The network has 0 adoption, and Lido is unlikely to ever make a profit on it. As for DOT and SOL, the rewards should be kept at a minimum as long as their DeFi ecosystem doesn’t improve.
Matic + L2s should be the main growth focus, as they have the most promising growth metrics, team, and tech. If during this bear market there’s not as many opportunities to use the LDO efficiently, it should be saved and/or redirected to other initiatives.


Very valid points.

We are working on a framework to better allocate between the different Lido on X chains and should have it soon. Regarding less opportunities available during a bear, we agree and have been consistently reducing overall reWARDS spend month over month for the past few.

Hope to share updates on LoX reWARDS framework soon. Happy to chat more if you’re interested


Happy to help, sending you a DM on here.

Hey, along with other LDO incentives reduction, sharing those two to fit the market conditions and competitive space:

  1. Curve pool LDO rewards decrease from 55,000 LDO / week to 50,000 LDO / week, leading to saving 25,000 LDO in December because of having five Tuesdays, when refill occurs.

  2. Solarbeam pool LDO rewards decrease from 70,000 LDO / month to 60,000 LDO / month. Also, this refill is for 35 days instead of 30, meaning the refill transaction amount is still 70,000 LDO. As a result of decrease and a time shift we have 70,000 LDO instead of 140,000 provided to the pool.


Hey guys, a small correction on the December budget for Raydium: for pool stSOL-USDT there is an increase of 4,000 LDO → 5,000 LDO.

1 Like

Hi everyone, some more changes for Dec planned vs Dec actual:
Synthetify: 1,000 LDO → 0 LDO
Crema: 1,000 LDO → 0 LDO
Solend: 10,000 LDO → 0 LDO
Francium: 0 → 1,500 LDO
Thank you!

1 Like