# Transparent & predictable emission schedule

**URL:** <https://research.lido.fi/t/transparent-predictable-emission-schedule/187>\
**Category:** General\
**Created:** [January 13, 2021, 6:27pm UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/transparent-predictable-emission-schedule/187 "2021-01-13T18:27:39Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 9

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![vsh](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/b19c9b/32.png) [@vsh](https://research.lido.fi/u/vsh)\
**Post date:** [January 15, 2021, 6:17am UTC](https://research.lido.fi/t/transparent-predictable-emission-schedule/187/9 "2021-01-15T06:17:32Z")

</div>

> [@Anjan\_ParaFi](#):
>
> Building the most liquid pool through Curve: This starts to build a moat around stETH compared to other liquid staking protocols. While the Curve pool has grown, there’s still room to increase liquidity. I could see a case to increase the distribution here by 1.5x to 2x.

While liquidity can and should be deeper in absolute numbers, I think we’ve reached saturation in relatives. 85% of stETH is in pool, because there’s not much to do with stETH atm. Not sure that increased distribution will do much good here, I think there’re going to be diminishing returns on it.

Setting additional incentivization for using stETH in Maker etc is a great move. I think we, ideally, want something like “20% of stETH in liquidity, 50% in money protocols, 30% fallow”.

In addition to the groups mentioned above, I would absolutely love to have ETH/ETH2 core developers in the ecosystem. They’re all smart, hardworking, and absolutely crucial for Lido’s continued operations. They should have a say in governance if they want it. I think we should set aside some portion of DAO funds for them too.

---

_[View the full topic](https://research.lido.fi/t/transparent-predictable-emission-schedule/187)._
