General Thoughts
Thank you to all the work from the multiple teams pushing wstETH improvements on Starknet/Lido forward. In general, the more control Lido DAO exercises over the flow of wstETH and stETH to external chains, the better. Historically, we’ve seen similar social checks/balances on wstETH bridging solutions, like optimism’s, and believe that viewing the proposed wstETH improvements through a lens of past precedent may be prudent. While we read the final deployment verification report from Nethermind Security, we feel the following questions would be helpful answering for visibility:
Questions
-
Who are the actors capable of upgrading/disabling/enabling the bridging solution on the L1 and L2 side?
-
What safety measures are in place in case Lido governance experiences connectivity issues and loses the power to enforce its will?
-
With the recency of LIP 22, which enabled rebasable stETH on L2s from the stable balancer wrapper of wstETH, we find it pertinent to ask why a similar transition from wstETH to stETH was not taken on Starknet?