Establishing the APM Committee

mev-commit (Primev) Testing Results

We’ve concluded the mev-commit testing phase, as described in the APM Decision.
Over the past weeks, Lido validators opted into Primev’s mev-commit network on the Hoodi testnet. Below is a concise summary of the most relevant findings from (1) Primev’s published results and (2) our internal performance analysis.


Key Results
During the Hoodi testnet phase, ~16,000 Lido validators opted into Primev’s mev-commit network across 8 operators. Adoption came in waves, with a large batch (~10k validators) onboarded in early December.

Primev-reported metrics (shared with Lido team):

  • 0 slashing events
  • 0.53% missed proposal rate (8/1,506 blocks)
  • 98.5% active-online rate
  • 93.8% clean-day rate

Lido internal analysis confirms:

  • ~99.84% average uptime across clusters
  • 98.9–100% proposal success per operator
  • 99.55% overall proposal success
  • No operator-specific degradation linked to mev-commit

Even under elevated testnet missed-slot conditions, Lido clusters maintained strong proposer performance.

Overall Assessment
Combining Primev’s reported metrics with our internal validation:

  • No slashing observed
  • Missed proposals remain extremely low
  • Uptime and attestation performance remain within normal ranges
  • No cluster-specific performance degradation
  • Rewards distribution successfully tested

Under Hoodi testnet conditions, mev-commit integration appears operationally stable and technically compatible with Lido’s validator set.
Further mainnet validation would be required to assess long-term revenue impact and latency sensitivity under real economic load, but the testing phase does not surface material technical blockers.
Thus, I am recommending the inclusion in the APM Allow List.