I would like to add that we also need a list of those that the committee has checked but disapproved (with reasons for disapproval)
From experience with DAO, very often committees only provide positive data for use, but there is no data on which programs are better not to use - this will give more information to DAO and operators
It will also reduce the effect of personal interests (if such arise)
Second question. Will the work of this committee be paid somehow from the Treasury?