As an individual stakeholder, I think the Lido DAO should prioritize strengthening its governance before focusing on boosting the protocol token’s value. Currently, only about 5–6% of the circulating supply participates in votes, which is quite low and could lead to governance or security vulnerabilities. Increasing participation should be the first priority, and that’s where revenue should be directed, in my opinion. Once voting participation reaches more optimal levels, like 15–20%, then it might make sense to shift attention toward increasing the token’s value.
I actually wrote about this earlier: [RFC] Adjusting Delegate Incentivization Program , but I guess not many share the same view.