# Increasing LOL Easy Track Limits to align with Grant Requests
I voted FOR. In the current bear market climate this seems sensible to me. Operational continuity is key.
# CSM: stakeShareLimit and keyRemovalCharge parameters adjustment
I voted FOR. And strongly so as it is good to see the need to increase the stake limit and see further growth in the CSM. We need to get those 50 node operators out of that queue. The charge reduction seems sensible in current market conditions.
# Lido Alliance application: Twyne
Voted FOR. Rendering stETH more useful in DeFi lending seems very intriguing. I had missed this post before but it actually seems really exciting and fits into the broader GOOSE goals wrt the institutional side.
# Extend Delegate Incentivization Program through 2025
A bit of a meta post for us delegates since it concerns us. I voted FOR since there is no Abstain on Snapshot. I am FOR the program because it clearly does incentivise a core of delegates to participate seriously, where we might otherwise not be so motivated. I feel personally this gives the DAO a sort of bedrock of assured and informed voters. My only contention is that perhaps the lowering of the limit is perhaps not quite the right solve. Really it’s more about getting large token holders to delegate. My sense is that surely there are more out there who could lift people up to 2m. However, that’s a minor quibble really.
An on-chain vote following Snapshot. 1. Updates the Accounting, Validator Exit Bus, and CSM oracles in preparation for Pectra and 2. Updates the CS Verifier Contract. The forum thread reports no issues though I would echo Pol that a verification guide for cases like this are useful but I think should be easier to find. I would also note the audits are in cases quite long, sometimes 100+ pages more, and so I often find myself extracting the most pertinent information. It might perhaps help to extract the core information delegates need here (perhaps AI-assisted).