Proposal to freeze vesting for compromised address

Proposals
5

We imagine we have three options to shape a vote:

  1. Burn most of unvested LDOs on 0x48acf41d10a063f9a6b718b9aad2e2ff5b319ca2 and mint the exact same amount on address 0x… with the same vesting parameters as the original one.
  2. Burn most of unvested LDOs on 0x48acf41d10a063f9a6b718b9aad2e2ff5b319ca2 and do not mint, with implication that minting would be done not in a hurry with a good due process.
  3. Burn most of unvested LDOs on 0x48acf41d10a063f9a6b718b9aad2e2ff5b319ca2 and mint at address 0x… with vesting set to a year’s lock, with implication that changing the vesting terms to original ones would be done not in a hurry with a good due process.

How do you think the vote should be shaped? Time’s of the essence so we’ll go with rough consensus here.

4 Likes