Sorry, I can’t get whether this “professional forum lobbist” label is towards me, but I do not want to be labeled as INSECTS, PARASITES and other based on my professional origin and get attacked by your community just because I do not agree with you or my ideas, comments or vision for the proposal / voting differs from yours.
I believe we are a bit early to review the Delegate Program Incentive. As well as it may be too early to exercise in evaluation of the progress on each objective of the program itself. Since the delegation started, it has been only one month.
I believe we should give more time to allow the program to get to its maximum from the perspective of different sides: token holders are fully aware and understand the benefits from delegation; delegates prove themselves as reliable participants of governance (I think it’s
hastily to evaluate individual delegate contribution now, as most are excited with a new opportunity to involve and be heard at the DAO – let’s see who are here for a long run in a couple of months); participation on the forum and voting has increases etc.
As we are marching towards a new GOOSE cycle we can revisit one of the initial goals “Lido has effective and decentralized governance” (see Hasu’s post) with an updated vision towards the governance evolution, taking into account dual governance implementation, Public Delegate platform and other key components.