Ignas Delegate Thread

Delegate Platform
8

Date Voted: November 22, 2024

9. Proposal: Establish the Network Expansion Committee (NEC) (Snapshot)

  • Vote: Approve NEC
  • Rationale: I support this proposal. I believe creating NEC will help Lido scale faster, streamline processes, and reduce human error.

10. Proposal: Should Pier Two continue in the Curated Module Set following the acquisition of Numic? (Snapshot)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: After going through all the details provided by LNOSG, I believe Pier Two should continue their work.

11. Proposal: Should Alchemy continue in SDVT and LoP following the acquisition of Bware Labs? (Snapshot)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: I think LNOSG did a great job evaluating the transition and ensuring there won’t be any disruption in node operations after Alchemy took over Bware Labs. Given that, I believe Alchemy should definitely continue their work as planned.

12. Proposal: Should Nansen continue in SDVT following the acquisition of Stakewithus? (Snapshot)

  • Vote: For
  • Rationale: I voted “For” because I believe LNOSG did a thorough evaluation, and keeping Nansen involved makes sense since there are no major changes.

13. Proposal: Reevaluation of Lido on Polygon state (Snapshot)

  • Vote: Sunset Lido on Polygon
  • Rationale: This is a tough decision, but I agree Lido should focus on its core operations like Ethereum, where they has strong growth and community support. Spreading resources too thin on areas that aren’t showing much value or adoption isn’t sustainable.
    Although polygon has potential with recent ecosystem growth or zkEVM developments, the costs in liquidity incentives or audit expenses and other costs are higher than the returns. So, I vote to “sunset Lido on Polygon” and focus on core activities to minimize financial losses.

14. Proposal: GOOSE 2024 cycle: Lido DAO goals for 2025 (Snapshot)