Kuzmich Delegate Thread

Where do you think Lido earn revenue goes? It goes straight into the treasury.

3 Likes

Title: Shapshot Voting Increase Easy Track transfer limits for Liquidity Observation Lab to align with EGG

Decision: Vote FOR

Increasing the limits is a necessary measure, so there is little point in discussing it, but I think that in the future these limits will have to be raised again.

Title: Shapshot Voting Should Pier Two continue in the Curated and SDVT sets following the acquisition by Bitmine Immersion Technologies?

Decision: Vote FOR

A standard procedure that has happened before.
The only interesting thing is that such a large fund decided to diversify its business.

Title: Shapshot Voting Transition from GateSeals to CircuitBreaker

Decision: Vote SUPPORT

Switching to a single contract is a good solution that will reduce the time spent on servicing and processing requests to suspend contracts, which in theory will reduce costs.

Title: Shapshot Voting NEST: Automated LDO Buyback and Liquidity Provisioning

Decision: Vote AGAINST

This proposal was discussed back at the end of last year, and there were numerous arguments for and against it.
I believe these conditions leave tokenholders virtually without any profit.
The $40 million cap suggests the company has no intention of reducing costs and has no intention of doing so. In this case, tokenholders are the last ones to benefit from the project, which shouldn’t be the case.
It also doesn’t take into account previously earned profits, which could have been used for a useful buyback rather than simply hoarded in treasuries.

Title: Shapshot Voting Adopt the Node Operator Type Assessment Framework for CMv2

Decision: Vote APPROVE

This is what Laido has been striving for recently—to give advantages to those operators who will generate profit not only for themselves, but for the community or the project.
Now the committee will decide who falls into which group and accordingly assign each group its own profitability (but not within the framework of this proposal).

Title: On-chain Vote #201

Decision: Vote YES

All decisions are either requests, or a necessity, or the implementation of what was previously decided
The proposal extends Dual Governance for one year (though it could have been longer).
Consensys changes its address upon request.
Increases the limit for Easy Track to $5 million over six months.
VEBO will receive more frequent reports.