What Is LEGO? For a quick reminder, LEGO, short for Lido Ecosystem Grants Organization, is an innovative initiative by Lido DAO. Its main goal is to support projects that enhance the Ethereum liquid staking ecosystem. Focused on efficiency, LEGO provides vital funding and resources to a diverse group of innovators—from builders to researchers—helping them turn their creative ideas into reality.
LEGO is more than just a funding source; it acts as a catalyst for innovation, essential for keeping Lido at the forefront of liquid staking protocols.
A total of DAI 115.6K was allocated to LEGO grants, amounting to 23% of the allotted quarterly budget.
For an in-depth look at LEGOs Q3 journey, check out the full report. For a deeper look into previous quarters, the archive is here.
What’s Next: Q4 2025
The LEGO budget is updated to be at DAI 250,000 level, with 100% DAI (or another USD stable coin) token composition;
Individual allowances from now on are also fixed at DAI 15,000 each quarter for LEGO Council members. If a LEGO member’s wallet holds a balance equal to or higher than the calculated allowance, it will not be refilled;
LEGO Nominees body is dissolved and members are asked to return the remaining grants pool to the Treasury - 0x3e40D73EB977Dc6a537aF587D48316feE66E9C8c. Thank you for your continuous efforts in making Ethereum ecosystem a better place for liquid staking and a future of DeFi!
The refill amount and individual allowances for Q4 2025 are as follows:
What Is LEGO? For a quick reminder, LEGO, short for Lido Ecosystem Grants Organization, is an innovative initiative by Lido DAO. Its main goal is to support projects that enhance the Ethereum liquid staking ecosystem. Focused on efficiency, LEGO provides vital funding and resources to a diverse group of innovators—from builders to researchers—helping them turn their creative ideas into reality.
LEGO is more than just a funding source; it acts as a catalyst for innovation, essential for keeping Lido at the forefront of liquid staking protocols.
A total of DAI 179.2K was allocated to LEGO grants, amounting to 72% of the allotted quarterly budget.
For an in-depth look at LEGOs Q4 journey, check out the full report. For a deeper look into previous quarters, the archive is here.
What’s Next: Q1 2026
The LEGO budget stays at DAI 250,000 level, with 100% DAI (or another USD stable coin) token composition;
Individual allowances from now on are also fixed at DAI 15,000 each quarter for LEGO Council members. If a LEGO member’s wallet holds a balance equal to or higher than the calculated allowance, it will not be refilled;
The refill amount and individual allowances for Q1 2026 are as follows:
What Is LEGO? For a quick reminder, LEGO, short for Lido Ecosystem Grants Organization, is an innovative initiative by Lido DAO. Its main goal is to support projects that enhance the Ethereum liquid staking ecosystem. Focused on efficiency, LEGO provides vital funding and resources to a diverse group of innovators—from builders to researchers—helping them turn their creative ideas into reality.
LEGO is more than just a funding source; it acts as a catalyst for innovation, essential for keeping Lido at the forefront of liquid staking protocols.
A total of DAI 74.7K was allocated to LEGO grants, amounting to 30% of the allotted quarterly budget.
For an in-depth look at LEGOs Q1 journey, check out the full report. For a deeper look into previous quarters, the archive is here.
What’s Next: Q2 2026
The LEGO budget stays at DAI 250,000 level, with 100% DAI (or another USD stable coin) token composition;
Individual allowances from now on are also fixed at DAI 15,000 each quarter for LEGO Council members. If a LEGO member’s wallet holds a balance equal to or higher than the calculated allowance, it will not be refilled;
The refill amount and individual allowances for Q2 2026 are as follows:
What Is LEGO? For a quick reminder, LEGO, short for Lido Ecosystem Grants Organization, is an innovative initiative by Lido DAO. Its main goal is to support projects that enhance the Ethereum liquid staking ecosystem. Focused on efficiency, LEGO provides vital funding and resources to a diverse group of innovators—from builders to researchers—helping them turn their creative ideas into reality.
LEGO is more than just a funding source; it acts as a catalyst for innovation, essential for keeping Lido at the forefront of liquid staking protocols.
This past quarter, Q2 2026, had several grant applications, but unfortunately very few of them made it to the finish line.
A total of DAI 600 was allocated to LEGO grants, representing less than 1% of the allotted quarterly budget.
For an in-depth look at LEGOs Q2, check out the full report. For a deeper look into previous quarters, the archive is here.
What’s Next: Q3 2026
The LEGO budget stays at DAI 250,000 level, with 100% DAI (or another USD stable coin) token composition;
Individual allowances are fixed at DAI 15,000 each quarter for LEGO Council members. If a LEGO member’s wallet holds a balance equal to or higher than the calculated allowance, it will not be refilled;
Due to decreased granting activity for the recent quarters and in an attempt to optimize operations - next report will cover the remaining part of 2026 year and is expected to be published in Jan-2027.
The refill amount and individual allowances for Q3 2026 are as follows:
A question from outside, if this is the right thread for it.
Last week I published a survey that counted commits repairing feed handling
across 48 crypto organisations — 1,163 of them. The collector, the raw data and
the analysis are all public, so the numbers can be checked rather than taken on
trust. It is on GitHub under akarazhev, the repository called
price-feed-failure-survey — I can’t post links yet as a new account here.
Among repositories with any such commit, 58–64% have two or more, so the fault
class recurs rather than being fixed once. And the profile splits by role:
reconnect appears in 13% of subject lines at organisations that consume feeds
and 1% at those that publish them, while heartbeat runs the other way, 18%
against 6%.
Lido was not in that sample, and it sits on both sides of that split — it runs
its own oracles and consumes external data.
Before I spend time on it: would a comparison of the Lido oracle infrastructure
against that baseline be useful, or is this already covered internally? “No, we
track this” is a perfectly good answer and saves me the work.
Hi @akarazhev, thank you for your interest in Lido. As a contributor, I’m not sure this data would be useful for Lido’s oracle infrastructure.
I’d suggest not spending time on this analysis unless you’re personally interested in it.