Organize the Lido Alliance Program as a Lido-DAO-Adjacent BORG

[zuzu_eeka]

Hello @lex-node!
Thank you for such a clear, detailed proposal. I’m really impressed by the thoroughness and coherence of your approach.
I am absolutely in favor of this proposal.

I have a couple of questions, all of them pretty operational, just to make some things more clear:

1. Regarding the approval process for future Directors:

@lex-node

Any future Directors would be approved by Lido DAO and the Board

What is the process for this approval? A snapshot vote?

2. What is the rotation process for the Guardians? Is it a quorum within the Committee or a DAO vote?

3. For the requirement of Lido DAO’s co-approval on the usage of Lido-Ally-contributed tokens:

@lex-node

Lido DAO’s co-approval is required for all usages of the Lido-Ally-contributed tokens as a security measure–this requirement is initially imposed by virtue of the BORG’s Bylaws, and Lido contributors and MetaLeX hope to create additional onchain enforcement of these rules as well, though the technical ability to do so may vary from chain to chain.

How will this approval process work, and do you have an expert opinion on how frequently such approvals might be needed from the DAO?

6. Is there any form of reporting expected for Operational funds?

7. Additionally, I would like to mention that if the DAO votes in favor during the snapshot, there will be an on-chain vote to add the Easy Track factory to the registry of factories.