Organize the Lido Alliance Program as a Lido-DAO-Adjacent BORG

Proposals
21

Hi there!

Thank you for the proposal. I’d like to ask for your responses to some of my questions to highlight certain aspects of the proposal that give me a sense of lack of transparency.
It is also probably important to clarify that I am currently a signers of the Voteron, and the answers to these questions in our internal discussions helped me make my decision in the vote. Therefore, I would like to bring the answers to the public.

  1. Who are MetaLex? Could you briefly explain why I should trust your legal expertise?
  2. Could you provide a description of the powers of the Emergency Supervisor role here on the forum? It seems to be a very important position.
  3. Please clarify the eligibility criteria for the BORG Personnel.
  4. Please cpecify which source should be relied on when discussing the purpose of the BORG, given the forum post mentions that one of the purposes is “owning and holding assets contributed by such Lido DAO Allies,” while the Bylaws state “to hold and use any Blockchain Tokens lawfully owned or held by the BORG in support of the Authorized Uses.”
  5. Could you clarify the budget size being requested and why it’s for six months, considering there’s just over a quarter left in the year?
  6. Also, could you clarify the EasyTrack limit that’s proposed to be annual, and make sure it’s accurate before the on-chain vote?

Thank you!

2 Likes