Vote: For.
Rationale: Re-run of the #187 that didn’t reach quorum. Rationale stays the same.
Vote: For.
Rationale: Yes as per Snapshot rationale regarding Dual Governance
Vote: For.
Rationale: As the largest solo staking community, we are gladly supporting this proposal with a ‘for’ vote. More decentralisation, extra safety measures, better performance tracking and a comprehensive framework for all type of Node Operators showcase in this proposal, which also is accompanied of the increase of the CSM stakeshare, the ultimate proof of seeing module growth.
Triggerable Withdrawals Framework in the Lido Protocol
Vote: For.
Rationale: We voted ‘for’ this proposal. The Triggerable Withdrawals Framework is a huge step forward for Lido. The fact that validators can be exited by the DAO directly from Ethereum’s execution layer if they or their Node Operators go rogue or lose their keys makes the protocol more resilient while it increases community control over validator management. Another great point is the split of the GateSeal into separate contracts. Looking forward to seeing it implemented.
Vote: For.
Rationale: Voting for since they correspond to approved Snapshot proposals we’ve supported as well as operational decisions stated in the forum.