Should Pier Two continue in the Curated Module Set following the acquisition of Numic?
Vote: For
Summary: We agree with the summary outlined here by Sven and LNOSG. Given there is material change to the infrastructure following the acquisition of Numic by Pier Two we agree with the proposed trial run on testnet and gradual ramp-up on mainnet.
Should Alchemy continue in SDVT and LoP following the acquisition of Bware Labs?
Vote: For
Summary: In line with LNOSG’s review we are supportive of this proposal.
Should Nansen continue in SDVT following the acquisition of Stakewithus?
Vote: For
Summary: In line with LNOSG’s review we are supportive of this proposal.
GOOSE 2024 cycle: Lido DAO goals for 2025
Vote: Adopt Goals
Summary: We support the adoption of Lido Goals for 2025. Lido has successfully (or near) achieved prior goals set out, building a thin & market leading middleware for decentralised Ethereum staking. We are excited and supportive of Lido’s horizontal expansion of products tailored to key user groups. The market for validators is a clear next step that should help in growing Lido’s network, addressing key issues on the infrastructure supply side. Lastly, we agree with the push to begin creating stronger alignment between LDO and the future growth of the protocol.
Reevaluation of Lido on Polygon state
Vote: Sunset Lido on Polygon
Summary: When looking at stMATICs market share, total TVL, and overall growth metrics it’s fair to say that there has been a significant decrease/stagnation across the board. Furthermore, as others have mentioned Lido on Polygon doesn’t necessarily fit into the DAO’s goals, bringing further question as to whether the outsized cost and time required to rewrite it’s implementation is worth the future expected benefit of stMATIC. Therefore, we will be voting to Sunset Lido on Polygon.