April vote updates and reasoning:
Aragon On-chain vote 185
Verification guide here
Vote: Yes
Rationale:
Ensuring continued compatibility with Ethereum’s upcoming Pectra hardfork is essential and this is a first step in ensuring operability.
I have reviewed the payload and verification guide and have voted yes.
Thank you to the DAO Ops team for always providing incredible guides and information to ensure we have an easier time of verifying everything.
Snapshot Signals:
Extend Delegate Incentivization Program through 2025
Forum post here
Vote: For
Rationale:
Disclaimer: I am a new delegate and have not financially benefited from this program to date. With this vote I may be eligible in the future for rewards for my work.
I have provided more information here that I do not agree with all the changes to the program, however, I am not going to stop or halt the program for these minor recommendations seeing as in general the program is achieving its goals. I will consider being more forward and aggressive in the future about these recommendations based on another quarter of data and information.
Lido Alliance application: Twyne
Forum post here
Vote: For
Rationale:
The project albeit extremely early seems promising and the conditions are very beneficial to Lido if they are successful.
- 10% of Twyne’s token supply subject to a 1 year cliff and 2 years vesting
- 50% revenue share on stETH pools where revenue share for Lido Alliance is primarily used for incentives and liquidity on Twyne
They are also incubated and invested in by Euler, followed by Angel backing from names like Daedalus who are well known to the Ethereum ecosystem and have great track records.
CSM: stakeShareLimit and keyRemovalCharge parameters adjustment
Forum post here
Vote: For
Rationale:
CSM is a great initiative that is having amazing early traction. Increasing from 2 to 3% is an easy and conservative change which is safe. In fact, I agree with @Lanski that this hopefully can be accelerated in the future.
Increasing LOL Easy Track Limits to align with Grant Requests
Forum post here
Vote: For
Rationale:
At this stage I don’t see why not. I’d recommend being very careful though with this mentality: “provide a comfortable buffer above the anticipated spend to support the committee’s operations over upcoming periods” as there are always costs associated with large buggers.