[Lido Labs] GOOSE-3: Lido’s Next Chapter

TL;DR

With Lido V3 launching soon, concrete plans for staking growth via stVaults and institutional offerings, and a market-based rebalancing of the protocol for greater sustainability in sight, Lido’s initial mission to build a secure, decentralized, and simple liquid staking protocol for Ethereum has largely succeeded. Lido DAO is now poised for its next major growth chapter.

This proposal sets out a strategic focus for a new approach to growth:

  • Vertically Up the Stack - building end-user products to capture higher value, establish a direct relationship with the user base, and gain a stronger strategic position
  • Horizontal Expansion - moving into new asset classes to add breadth, capture new demand, and diversify revenue streams

2026 Goals:

  • Expand the Staking Ecosystem

Focus: Strengthen adoption of stETH and stVaults through active distribution, new integrations and partnerships including the expected launch of the staked ETH ETF in the US. Expand the stVaults line with a modular “constructor” for rapid launch of custom DeFi structured products

  • Ensure Protocol Resilience: Lido Core Upgrade

Focus: Deliver Curated Module v2 and Staking Router v3, introducing ValMart, a validator-market mechanic that routes stake by performance, cost, and decentralization

  • Scale New DAO Revenue Streams: Lido Earn

Focus: Expand to serve diverse user segments with tailored yield and risk profiles, scaling into a strong revenue line

  • Explore Vertical Expansion and Real-World Business Applications

Focus: Explore real-business DeFi, connecting offchain economic activity to onchain liquidity, through a dual-track approach: running multiple fast, lean projects securing fast wins, balanced with the pursuit of a single large-scale, billion-dollar opportunity

In parallel, the GOOSE-2 goal of “LDO alignment” is expected to be advanced in H1 2026 with the deployment of the NEST system, subject to a DAO vote, which will align LDO token success more directly with the Lido protocol’s success through onchain buybacks financed from DAO revenue.

These are the first steps toward a proposed evolution from the staking leader into the primary DeFi gateway for real businesses, powering the new era of global finance.

DeFi’s center of gravity is shifting toward real-world business utility. As Ethereum becomes the settlement layer for tokenized assets and real-world finance, this is the environment where Lido’s next major growth opportunity lies.

Over the next three years, the proposed strategy is for the Lido DAO to take position at the center of this shift, bridging onchain liquidity with offchain economic activity, developing products for real-world businesses who seek onchain treasury management, financing, and investment, and giving them access to secure, scalable, and composable DeFi infrastructure.

1. Introduction

This submission is presented to the Lido DAO by the Lido Labs Foundation in collaboration with the Lido Ecosystem Foundation and the Lido Alliance BORG. Each of these independent entities has received Lido DAO grants to make contributions to the Lido protocol, working together under defined agreements outlining their roles and responsibilities. The submission proposes a set of strategic goals for 2026 cycle for the Lido DAO consideration within the GOOSE (The Guided Open Objective Setting Exercise) framework. Alongside this submission, a complementary EGG proposal will soon be published separately to outline execution paths for these goals, illustrating how the Lido Labs Foundation, the Lido Ecosystem Foundation, and the Lido Alliance BORG could help bring them to life once approved by the DAO.

The current proposal puts forward a plan for the Lido DAO to evolve from shepherding a single-product protocol focused on liquid staking to an innovative organization with a product portfolio, deepening reach with current users, addressing new market segments, creating new revenue streams, and laying groundwork for future DeFi applications that serve real-world business.

Making staking as accessible and useful as possible is the idea that made Lido great, and it changed Ethereum forever. Lido has largely fulfilled its original mission: to build a secure, decentralized, and simple liquid staking protocol for Ethereum. The protocol has maintained a perfect record, having zero incidents with monetary impact on users since launch, Dual Governance as a unique safeguard that allows stakers to exit the protocol in case of disagreement with governance direction (or a possible attack), and a diverse operator set of 683 unique node operators with permissionless entry through the Community Staking Module (CSM).

Today, as the staking market matures and competition intensifies, primary growth avenues are supporting the flagship product, stETH, with adjacent offerings like stVaults and ETPs to increase the user base, and expanding beyond staking through new product lines, such as structured products, into the broader DeFi landscape. This is expected to lay the groundwork for Lido to lead the next wave of DeFi growth, powered by real-world business adoption.

2. Proposal

This section sets out a proposed set of strategic goals for Lido DAO for the 2026 cycle, together with a three-year vision. If the proposal is accepted, Lido DAO will adopt the following goals as its own strategic direction and enter its next growth chapter by expanding its staking product line and developing end-user products that capture higher value and strengthen its strategic position, broadening the offering, attracting new demand, and diversifying revenue.

2.1 Three-Year Vision

Staking becomes a mature, profitable product line

With Lido DAO’s core mission largely complete (see Lido on Ethereum Scorecard), the protocol now stands as a secure, decentralized, and scalable staking platform. The focus therefore shifts from foundational engineering to ecosystem growth: expanding the product portfolio to reach underserved user segments, deepening adoption, and delivering targeted, incremental improvements to the protocol. This new vector will strengthen the protocol’s sustainability and drive DAO revenue growth.

Vertical and horizontal expansion

  • Vertical - build end-user products that capture higher value, deepen relationships with the existing user base, and strengthen strategic resilience
  • Horizontal - expand into stablecoins and new asset classes, opening new sources of demand and diversifying revenue streams

The long-term bet: DeFi that serves real-world business

The broader DeFi market is maturing and gradually moving toward real-world use cases such as treasury management, borrowing, and investment.

The long-term goal envisioned in this proposal is to capture the next wave of DeFi adoption and position Lido as the primary gateway to DeFi for real-world capital through the development of an extended product stack.

2.2 One-Year Focus

To execute this vision, the following 2026 goals are proposed for the DAO’s consideration.

2.2.1 Leading with Staking

Over the last few years, the Lido protocol has cemented itself as the most robust and decentralized liquid staking solution at scale, allowing any user to participate in securing Ethereum, both from a capital as well as from a node operator perspective. After ETH, stETH is the most widely used non-stablecoin asset in Ethereum DeFi.

Growth in staking in 2026 will be headlined via the adoption of Lido V3 stVaults. As a new staking product, stVaults enable integrators, node operators, custodians, and large asset allocators to create tailored yield-bearing strategies for their customers with staking as the core engine, benefiting from the liquidity and utility of stETH.

Additionally, key integrations and regulatory tailwinds enable the further advancement of institutional-friendly packaging of stETH- and stVault-based staking, such as via Exchange Traded Products / Funds (ETPs / ETFs), allowing a broader swathe of users to benefit from the ability to earn rewards while securing the Ethereum network.

Lido Core will continue to be the flagship product, serving as the bulwark of the protocol and routing stake across hundreds of node operators around the globe. The planned improvements to Lido Core within the year will enhance the DAO’s economic sustainability while maintaining the high degree of decentralization at scale that the protocol is known for.

2.2.1.1 Expand the Staking Ecosystem

stVaults: Modular Staking Infrastructure

With Lido V3 Mainnet launch around the corner, Lido Staking transitions from a one-size-fits-most B2C model to a modular B2B2X ecosystem, where partners can build on top of its secure and liquid foundation.

The stVaults infrastructure enables customizable staking setups:

  • Stakers (e.g. large capital allocators) can select their node operators and the staking setup
  • Integrators such as layer 2s, node operators, wallets, custodians, and asset managers can design staking products with customized compliance requirements and their own fee structures, access to stETH liquidity, and build structured DeFi products on top
  • ETP issuers can enable products with higher amounts of assets staked (when compared to products powered by native staking), and access stETH’s on-demand liquidity to potentially meet redemption requirements by regulators, while staking with their node operator(s) of preference

To accelerate adoption, building-block infrastructure that empowers partners to launch custom staking and DeFi products with minimal effort will be made available. The first step is the DeFi Wrapper, a low-code toolkit with ready-made components that simplify complex tasks like multi-user pooled staking on top of an stVault and automated looping against lending markets, making product creation faster, more secure, and composable.

Expectations for stVaults: 1M ETH staked through stVaults by end-2026, generating approximately 1k ETH ($2.8M at current ETH price) in annual recurring revenue.

Momentum is already visible:

  • Linea plans to power their Native Yield mechanism, utilizing stVaults to stake most of the ETH bridged to Linea, turning the base token into a way to reward user activities on the network
  • Leading Ethereum node operators such as Solstice, Chorus One, Everstake and P2P are working on their stVaults-powered products
  • 38 early adopters have launched wstETH restaking vaults with Mellow

Lido Staking in ETPs

With increased regulatory clarity in key markets on the treatment of digital assets, as well as staking and liquid staking, the Exchange Traded Products landscape has seen a rapid evolution in 2025. As market participants gear up to enable staking in their digital asset ETPs, stETH stands out as a component product that could allow issuers and fund managers to meet the liquidity, redemption, and high stake rate requirements of discerning users. In October, VanEck (~$116.6B assets under management as at April 30, 2025) filed a registration statement for an ETF holding stETH, which will be available on US exchanges pending approval by the regulator.

The launch of stETH-based ETPs and ETFs, starting with the planned VanEck Lido Staked Ethereum ETF, marks a pivotal moment in connecting Ethereum’s native yield to traditional capital markets. These products provide investors access to staking rewards through familiar, regulated vehicles while supporting Ethereum network decentralization via Lido Core’s 683 node operators. By attracting a diverse range of participants, including asset managers, family offices, pension funds, and brokerage platforms, stETH ETPs and ETFs have the potential to unlock significant new capital inflows, accelerating the adoption of stETH and solidifying Lido’s role as the core staking middleware that powers institutional access to Ethereum staking.

2.2.1.2 Ensure Protocol Resilience: Lido Core Upgrade

The next major Lido Core upgrade, planned for 2026, brings together two components in active development: Curated Module v2 (CMv2) and Staking Router v3 (SRv3) with ValMart, a validator-market built directly into the router.

Together, they transform stake allocation in Lido Core from a simple round-robin system into a market-driven system, where operator fees, validator performance, and decentralization metrics determine how stake is dynamically routed and re-routed across the protocol.

Why it matters:

  • Balance of market-driven efficiency & decentralization - DAO governance defines fee ceilings per operator type, and each operator sets its fee curve below that ceiling. Differentiated operator types (e.g. standard, client-team, or underrepresented-region) allow the DAO to shape the validator set it wants. ValMart then automatically routes stake to the most cost-efficient and reliable operators within decentralization guardrails
  • Automated risk management - CMv2 introduces bonding for curated operators and links stake allocation and exit priority to validator performance, reducing protocol-level risk and enabling a shift towards more self-regulating, adaptive controls
  • Higher operational efficiency - SRv3 adds granular control with partial deposits/withdrawals, stake reallocation between operators and modules, and balance-based accounting supporting 0x01 & 0x02 validator types. This enables smaller validators consolidation into validators with the maximum effective balance of 2048 ETH, reducing operational overhead and network footprint

The transition from the current Curated Module to CMv2 is expected to happen in stages. The first step is planned for December 2025, pending a DAO vote: classification of Curated Module node operators into distinct types with different potential fee ranges. This fee structure update will better align the Curated Module with the fee market expected to form after ValMart’s 2026 release, and is projected to raise the DAO’s share of staking rewards generated by the Curated Module by about 20%. The Curated Module currently accounts for roughly 92% of gross staking revenue for the DAO.

Expected revenue impact inclusive of changes proposed to take effect at the end of 2025: +2.6k ETH ($7.3M at current ETH price) in annual recurring DAO revenue, with possible future uplift once ValMart is implemented, from improved fee alignment and dynamic validator pricing.

This upgrade completes the Lido staking protocol’s technical arc, turning the staking router into an adaptive validator marketplace that balances performance, cost, and decentralization while strengthening the DAO’s financial base.

2.2.2 New Products

To secure long-term resilience and unlock new growth, this proposal envisions Lido expanding its product portfolio beyond staking.

The goal is to build a diverse set of revenue lines, opening access to new markets and user segments. These new products turn Lido from a single-engine staking protocol into an ecosystem where multiple product lines grow in symbiosis.

2.2.2.1 Scale New DAO Revenue Streams: Lido Earn

Launched in Sept 2025, Lido Earn opened a new product line for ETH depositors offering competitive yield vaults, including DeFi and Distributed Validator Technology (DVT) strategies. Early traction is strong: $180M in TVL and ~$2M in annualized fees within the first months.

Focus for 2026: expand Lido Earn into a scalable, multi-segment product suite that meets different yield appetites and risk profiles:

  • DeFi Power Users - multi-strategy, auto-compounding vaults for ETH and stablecoins, maximizing blended yield
  • Restakers - specialized restaking and looping vaults for users optimizing ETH yield
  • Stablecoin Savers - lending and RWA-based vaults providing steady USD-denominated returns
  • Passive Earners - pooled staking and low-volatility vaults for users seeking simple, “set-and-forget” ETH and stablecoin yield
  • Treasury Managers - compliant RWA vaults with integrated KYC and reporting for stablecoins and ETH yield

ERC-4626 wrappers will enable seamless integration of Earn vaults into structured DeFi products built by external teams.

Expectations: reach $8M in annual recurring revenue by end-2026.

2.2.2.2 Explore Vertical Expansion and Real-World Business Applications

To expand the product portfolio, the Lido Labs Foundation in collaboration with the Lido Ecosystem Foundation and the Lido Alliance BORG will systematically explore, validate, and propose new ideas that bring Lido closer to users and real-world business.

This work follows a dual-track model - running many small bets in parallel while preparing for one large bet when the right opportunity emerges.

Track 1. Small Bets: Fast, Focused, and Scalable

Small bets are lean experiments designed to test new product ideas quickly, identify promising wedges, and secure fast wins. They operate on limited resources and short validation cycles. Each experiment must prove real market traction before requesting additional DAO funding to scale.

The goal is to build an internal venture culture with a framework where small autonomous teams can pitch ideas, secure “seed” allocations, launch MVPs, and measure outcomes transparently. Validated products graduate into larger lines of business. This process will turn Lido into a venture machine continuously discovering and scaling new growth engines while keeping risk contained.

Example: DeFi Accessibility Initiative

This initiative creates an integration layer reducing the cost and complexity for wallets, exchanges, custodians, and node operators to offer Lido products.

The product concept proposed for exploration is a B2B middleware solution: a set of dedicated smart contract vaults that allow integrators to manage deposits, rewards, and fees, combined with a configurable front-end widget/iframe and backend APIs for simple, custom integrations.

In the long-term, this product line has potential to evolve into an integration layer for real-world finance platforms like custodians and banks looking to offer a wider range of DeFi products, e.g., lending markets.

Expectations: $1M annual recurring revenue by end-2026, with significant scaling potential as adoption broadens.

Beyond this, multiple small bets will run in parallel, each probing a new wedge, market segment, or integration path, all built on the same playbook of fast testing and disciplined scaling.

Track 2. The Big Bet: Precision Before Scale

In parallel, Lido Labs will explore a potential Big Bet, a major expansion with billion-dollar revenue potential in real-business applications.

The principle is patience and precision: no early large commitment of resources until a clear strategic wedge and credible path to dominance are identified.

Once the right opportunity surfaces, where Lido has a unique edge and can lead a growing segment, the DAO can make the decision to back it decisively.

In summary:

  • Small bets build momentum, validate ideas, and strengthen the internal product engine
  • The big bet defines the next strategic leap, taken only when conviction is proven

Together, these tracks form an evolving product ecosystem around the Lido staking protocol - one designed for continual renewal and compounding growth.

3. Rationale

3.1 Overview of Lido Today

The Ethereum staking market has slowed. Growth stands at +5% year-to-date, down from +18% in 2024, with 35.7M ETH now staked. Liquid staking has plateaued, comprising 47% of total staked ETH, a figure that has remained unchanged for over 15 months, signaling a possible saturation. New inflows have shifted toward CEXs, institutional providers, and APR-maxi products.


Chart data source

Lido’s staking share declined from 28.3% to 24.1%, and its share within liquid staking fell from 60% to 50.8%, reflecting 1M ETH in net outflows year-to-date. That being said, Q4 has seen a reversal of the downward trend with positive net inflows in both October and November. The main drivers of the outflows were: delayed regulatory clarity around liquid staking (with earlier guidance favoring solo, delegated and custodial staking models), ETH absorption by ETFs and Digital Asset Treasury Companies, and APR compression that redirected yield-seeking users toward higher-risk alternatives.

Despite market headwinds, 2025 was a year of strong delivery on Lido’s technical and decentralization roadmap, with key unlocks coming at the end of this year that will strengthen the product basis and improve economics for the DAO in 2026:

  • Lido V3 mainnet launch will introduce stVaults, a modular infrastructure layer, which broadens the solution space for builders and integrators looking to offer stETH to customers
  • CSM v2 introduced the ability for the protocol to distinguish different types of node operators, and implemented a verified identity layer for community stakers. The upgrades to CSM have allowed it to reach a 4.25% share of the protocol’s total stake, with a sight to reach 10% in H1 2026, while remaining permissionless, enfranchising nearly 200 home stakers, and boosting DAO rewards from module-operated stake by 51% (from an effective DAO rewards rate of 4% to 6.04%)
  • The Simple DVT Module (SDVT) grew to 322 distinct operators, all using distributed validator technology, strengthening the resilience of the protocol and offering users who preferred to direct their stake towards this module additional rewards in the form of DVT provider incentives, via the DVV vault now featured in Lido Earn
  • Classification of Curated Module node operators into distinct types and a fee adjustment are planned for December, paving the way for the CMv2 upgrade in 2026, measures which are expected to increase the DAO’s share of Curated Module staking rewards by about 20%
  • Dual Governance went live in July, empowering stETH holders with the right to exit in case of disagreement with LDO-driven protocol changes
  • Triggerable withdrawals were implemented, improving protocol resilience and node operator accountability
  • The protocol successfully navigated the Ethereum Pectra upgrade with no downtime or incidents

Today, Lido’s foundational mission is largely complete:

  • Zero security incidents with monetary impact on users since launch
  • Dual Governance safeguards stakers against capture and governance risk
  • A diverse operator set with 683 unique active node operators, and open, permissionless entry via CSM

With the core attributes of the Lido on Ethereum Scorecard fulfilled, work remaining to balance economic sustainability of the protocol and decentralization incentives, such as CMv2 and SRv3, now represents incremental improvements upon the robust and resilient foundation.

This milestone allows the DAO to shift its focus from foundational engineering to product expansion and partner network development, building the next layer of growth upon the existing base.

The next chapter outlined in this proposal builds on what made Lido successful: security, trust, and pragmatic idealism. At the same time the historic constraints are turned into direction:

  • Where distance from the user limited value capture, Lido moves up the stack
  • Where long cycles slowed momentum, Lido embraces them as its strength, building securely and deliberately, placing long-term bets on products that create lasting value for real-world business
  • Where revenue was concentrated, it opens new, diversified product lines

3.1.1 LDO Tokenomics & Alignment

Work on the GOOSE-2 “LDO alignment” goal continues into H1 2026. At its core is the NEST (Network Economic Support Tokenomics), a modular system designed to align the success of the LDO token with the success of the Lido Protocol. NEST enables swapping stETH from the DAO treasury to buy back LDO from the secondary market.

NEST development is underway, with the MVP delivery expected in December 2025.

The next steps include a community discussion on specific trigger conditions and parameters for LDO repurchases, such as cadence, thresholds, and allocation limits, followed by a DAO vote. After that, the automation module for NEST will be developed to implement the DAO’s decision.

3.2 How Will Ethereum’s Next Phase Reshape Staking and DeFi?

Ethereum is entering a new phase defined by improving regulatory clarity, growing tokenization of traditional assets, and major advances in scalability and user experience, positioning it for broad adoption.

Across the US and Europe, new frameworks like MiCA, the GENIUS Act, and the SEC’s guidance on staking have ended years of uncertainty, creating the environment for large-scale onchain finance.

Meanwhile, the tokenization of RWA is accelerating: the total RWA market capitalization reached $35.6B (+130% year-to-date). Tokenized treasuries ($9.2B market capitalization) and private credit products ($18.6B market capitalization) represent the two largest segments, turning Ethereum into a regulated, yield-bearing settlement layer for traditional capital. Liquidity is fragmenting across L2s and appchains, but overall scale is expanding rapidly, while user experience is being abstracted to the point where DeFi finally feels like finance: simple, reliable, and composable.


Chart data source

These shifts are transforming DeFi from an experimental playground into a real financial layer. The next growth wave will be driven by practical use cases such as treasury management, credit, and investment, where reliability, product flexibility, and capital efficiency become prerequisites for adoption.

Therefore, having established staking as a robust foundation, this proposal sets out a path for Lido to ride the broader DeFi wave and build products that serve real-world economic demand, connect capital onchain and offchain, and position itself as the bridge between Ethereum and the real-world economy.

3.3 What’s Next for Lido

Under this proposal, Lido would position itself as the gateway for real-business DeFi, a long-term vision for the DAO to build toward.

It continues the same philosophy that made Lido the staking leader: pragmatic idealism combining technical rigor with real-world purpose. The vision goes beyond securing Ethereum to enabling it to serve the broader economy.

This next act:

  • Builds on Lido’s strengths such as security-first engineering, a resilient brand, deep liquidity, a track record of pragmatic execution, and an unwavering focus on delivering the best user experience
  • Turns historic constraints into direction, expanding value capture beyond infrastructure, connecting closer to users, and building diverse, durable revenue streams
  • Focuses on real-world businesses seeking secure access to DeFi yields and liquidity, with the expectation that retail demand will follow through the same channels those businesses already trust

In essence, Lido’s next chapter would extend Ethereum’s reach from securing value to powering the flow of real-world capital.

4. Execution Approach

This section defines the guiding principles for teams executing on the goals approved by Lido DAO. If the proposal is accepted, executing contributors are expected to operate according to these principles when designing initiatives, allocating resources dedicated by the DAO, developing products, and communicating progress to the DAO.

Focus on measurable impact & cost discipline

Under this proposal, Lido’s execution model balances discipline and exploration.

The goal is to maintain excellence and commercial momentum in the core staking protocol, while selectively directing capacity towards scalable new products.

Every initiative will have clear success metrics: capital, time, and traction, with funding decisions driven by data and staged to ensure efficient use of resources and accountability for results.

Iterate through validation

New product lines, such as stVaults and Lido Earn, would begin as experiments and be validated through real user adoption, revenue signals, and feedback loops.

This evidence-driven process enables faster learning and continuous improvement, scaling what works and pruning what doesn’t.

Maintain optionality

Under this proposal, the product portfolio would include multiple small bets running in parallel on lean budgets. Each bet would be time-bound and success-gated: proven products earn additional funding, while others sunset without cost drag.

In parallel, exploration would continue for a Big Bet, a long-horizon opportunity pursued only when conviction and timing align.

This approach keeps Lido agile while preserving the upside of major breakthroughs.

Uphold resilience

Protocol security and reliability remain non-negotiable.

Every new venture will be bound by clear risk limits, ensuring that experimentation never compromises the safety, liquidity, or integrity of the Lido Protocol.

5. Closing Words

Together we successfully built and decentralized the largest liquid staking protocol, fulfilling the initial mission. Now, it is time to leverage that success for the next chapter of growth.

The landscape today presents a new, far larger opportunity: not just in securing Ethereum, but in extending its reach through new products, new assets, and new forms of value creation. In this proposal, staking is no longer the destination but the base layer from which Lido expands vertically and horizontally.

This next chapter is ambitious but it is built on the same principles of security, resilience, and pragmatic idealism that brought us this far. Let us build on our success to shape the next evolution of decentralized finance, that scales in depth, scope, and impact; ensuring Lido’s leadership for years to come.

23 Likes

Thank you for the very detailed analysis of the current situation and future vision.

Briefly on the goals:

  1. Expand the Staking Ecosystem
    This is a good goal, which I believe is what stVaults are designed to achieve. This will indeed lead to significant development, as ETFs are typically prohibited from engaging in operational activities and won’t stake ETH themselves.
    However, there is a cons: everything will depend on the adoption of the relevant legislation, and there are no options for another development. What if the law mandates that only US-registered companies use it, then the only winner would be, say, CoinBase?

  2. Ensure Protocol Resilience: Lido Core Upgrade
    This point is very good for the development of the system; it will be interesting to see how ValMart operates after all the updates.

  3. Scale New DAO Revenue Streams: Lido Earn
    I see good development proposals, but I don’t quite understand how staking business is connected to stablecoins, and RWAs as well. This is a completely different direction, and I don’t understand how Lido will have a competitive advantage in this sector. As far as I understand, most RWA companies are large institutions like BlackRock and Goldman Sachs, which have direct access to T-bills.

  4. Three-year vision
    As far as I understand, detailed goals for 2026 are presented here with specific values (and it’s great), although a three-year vision is barely mentioned. However, I didn’t see (correct me if I missed it) what is planned for the three years. Are these the same goals?

3 Likes

kpk supports this proposal and the strategic direction outlined for Lido’s next phase. With the core staking layer now secure and decentralised, expanding vertically through end-user products and horizontally into new revenue lines is the right evolution.

From kpk’s perspective as treasury managers and curators across multiple protocols, the proposed product portfolio evolution, particularly the Earn vaults line, creates meaningful opportunities for integrators, builders, and institutional users to access Lido-derived yield in a more flexible and scalable way. kpk considers this product vertical strategically important and expects it to play a growing role in both revenue generation and ecosystem expansion, and looks forward to contributing where we can add value

3 Likes

Horizontal Expansion - moving into new asset classes to add breadth, capture new demand, and diversify revenue streams.

In the long-term, this product line has potential to evolve into an integration layer for real-world finance platforms like custodians and banks looking to offer a wider range of DeFi products, e.g., lending markets.

This is incorrect, in my opinion. Lido’s advantage comes from its first-mover position and deep liquidity in the staking sector. Trying to expand into the broader DeFi space where large, established protocols with strong network effects and liquidity already exist(such as Morpho and Aave) would be inefficient. It would add unnecessary costs, complexity, and risks to the Lido brand. I think Lido Labs is overly optimistic about this mission.

I also believe the cost side creates a conflict of interest between the DAO Treasury and Lido Labs, since Lido Labs faces little downside if horizontal expansion fails. For this reason, these rules should be strictly followed to ensure development proceeds in the right direction:

They operate on limited resources and short validation cycles. Each experiment must prove real market traction before requesting additional DAO funding to scale.
The principle is patience and precision: no early large commitment of resources until a clear strategic wedge and credible path to dominance are identified.

Vertical Expansion should be the primary strategic path.
In crypto, market conditions can shift quickly. The DAO’s resources should be focused on preserving and strengthening Lido’s critical position as the main staking hub of the Ethereum ecosystem. All development efforts and any potential DeFi integrations should be built on top of the staking function.

stVaults and CSM are, in my view, the largest and most strategically correct moves in both the history and future of Lido.

Work on the GOOSE-2 ‘LDO Alignment’ goal continues into H1 2026.

NEST enables swapping stETH from the DAO treasury to buy back LDO from the secondary market.

Hasu clearly explained the purpose of this initiative in his post:
“LDO secures and directs the Lido protocol and its key resources.”
“By tying LDO more directly to protocol revenue, we can attract committed, long-term holders who are invested in Lido’s growth and success.”

The issue is that distributing revenue to all tokenholders through buybacks is far less efficient than distributing revenue only to tokenholders who delegate their tokens. Buybacks minimize the positive impact of revenue distribution and reward passive tokenholders who hold their shares on CEXs just as much as the committed tokenholders who actually help secure the protocol through governance participation.

DAO governance is still experimental, but Lido DAO is one of the leaders in this area. I hope it does not fall into centralization because a strictly decentralized governance structure would generate extremely positive long-term outcomes, just like the functional development strategies mentioned here.

1 Like

This feels like a timely and necessary recalibration of Lido’s long-term direction. The protocol has already proven its strength at the staking layer, so shifting the focus toward product breadth and deeper user-facing value makes sense. What stands out here is the willingness to evolve from a single-product success story into a broader product ecosystem without losing sight of the long-term decentralization and security priorities that built trust in the first place.

The emphasis on stVaults and structured products is compelling because it acknowledges where the market is heading. Users want tailored exposure, not just raw staking yields. The modular “constructor” approach could become a real unlock if it shortens the path from idea to deployment and makes it easier for Lido to address new user segments quickly.

ValMart might be one of the most important pieces in this proposal because it responds to two challenges that every large staking protocol faces: how to keep decentralization meaningful while also rewarding performance and cost efficiency. If implemented well, it could become a model for validator-market mechanics across the ecosystem.

The move toward real-world business applications is where the risk and the upside both sit. The dual-track approach of running small, fast experiments while pursuing a single high-value opportunity feels like the right balance. The main thing I would watch closely is ensuring that the DAO does not stretch itself too thin while entering markets that require strong operational clarity and regulatory awareness. Getting this phase right will determine whether Lido becomes a key DeFi gateway for real-world capital or simply spreads into too many directions at once.

The alignment of LDO with protocol success through NEST is another important step. If designed with clear guardrails, it could strengthen legitimacy and improve the long-term health of the token without undermining the DAO’s neutrality.

Overall, this proposal offers a coherent direction for Lido’s next chapter. It recognizes that staking has matured, and the next wave of growth will come from building products that serve real demand, both onchain and offchain. The clarity of the goals and the willingness to think several years ahead gives the DAO a solid foundation to work from. I support continued discussion and refinement of the execution plans, especially around risk management, product prioritization and governance oversight as the scope expands.

3 Likes

I doubt that’s going to be the case. Not where the things are going now, from what I see. If that happens, the correct response would depend on exact legislation: maybe there’d be a way to square the circle by having US based BORG? If not, then we’d have to wait it out while focusing on non-US markets. That’s a very hypothetical question; the proposal as is does not consider that development a base case.

The way I think about this development is that staking doesn’t feel like the industry where there’s a lot of growth opportunities left for Lido. Lido is already a biggest staking product; growing the share 2x would be an insane level accomplishment, 4x is mathematically impossible. Expanding into parallel ecosystems is hard, and among the big staking markets there’s just Solana. If we have to do a hard thing anyway, meatspace assets are just more interesting.

No, you’re right, 3 years goals are not explicitly spelled out. I think that to have really good and concrete ones we should do a bit of soul-searching over next year and find a direction where we can do new and exciting things with success, that’s why I’d stuggle to nail them down right now.

10 Likes

This is incorrect, in my opinion. Lido’s advantage comes from its first-mover position and deep liquidity in the staking sector. Trying to expand into the broader DeFi space where large, established protocols with strong network effects and liquidity already exist(such as Morpho and Aave) would be inefficient. It would add unnecessary costs, complexity, and risks to the Lido brand. I think Lido Labs is overly optimistic about this mission.

Thanks for raising this. The point about Lido’s advantage coming from first-mover position and deep liquidity in staking is absolutely correct. And that’s exactly why the proposal keeps the staking core as the center of gravity: most of the 2026 work is vertical (stVaults, institutional pathways, CMv2, SRv3, ValMart). At the same time, the honest reality is that staking offers relatively limited room for further innovation or long-term revenue growth. We’re close to the frontier in staking.
The next big horizon is how DeFi becomes useful to real-world businesses; and this is where Lido has an opportunity to evolve over the long run. It’s also true that we don’t have horizontal breadth today, and we’re not pretending we do.
The near-term focus stays vertical. But if the DAO wants optionality in the 3–5 year window, it has to start experimenting now. Given long development cycles and high downside risk, the only sensible way is through small, time-boxed bets that either validate themselves or get shut down quickly.

7 Likes

As a governance contributor for almost 3 years and a member of the Delegate Oversight Committee, I want to respond to your point.

NEST and liquid buybacks sit on a different axis from governance incentivization. Their purpose is narrow and clear: they do not attempt, and should not attempt, to incentivize delegation or participation in governance.

Incentivizing governance is a much harder problem. The challenge isn’t turnout alone. It’s the combination of turnout + quality. Decentralization provides safety only when voters understand proposals, hold enough context to verify decisions, and have the expertise to challenge weak assumptions. Designing incentives that strengthen this behavior is extremely delicate. Most models we’ve seen across the industry end up rewarding low-effort participation. They increase the number of votes but not the quality of decisions, and that dynamic leads not to decentralization, but to faster centralization, easier capture, or simply higher costs with no added value.

Right now, no governance incentive design reliably improves this situation, especially given how broad the Lido governance surface is. Between a bad design and no design, the latter is still the safer choice. Strengthening the link between the protocol success and LDO success is a sensible step. Lido Labs can return to governance incentives when a mechanism appears that actually improves effectiveness, rather than just increasing the vote count using Lido DAO Treasury-owned LDO for that, or when Lido Labs leadership or other regular proposers judges participation level critical enough to prioritize it directly.

3 Likes

Buybacks (or dividends) should be seen as cash transfers from owners to themselves. If those buybacks (or dividends) accrue only to LDO holders who delegate, you may incentivize more delegation, that is true. But you also incur a substantial cost on non-delegating LDO owners, which is most of them.

It’s a reality that most token holders don’t want to or can’t delegate, they just want to provide capital and otherwise trust contributor teams. So your idea would make LDO a worse asset to hold for non-delegating owners.

3 Likes

First of all, thanks for your replies.

I agree with you on this one and I’ve already suggested a potential rational approach to address the issue. I’m sure the industry will figure this out one way or another.

I also agree %100 with your second point. It’s not just sensible, it’s necessary.

Correct, but the incentive doesn’t need to be permanent. It can be ended once an optimal level of delegated tokens is reached(e.g. 150M LDO, already 3 times the current level). The tricky part, in my view, is simply getting tokenholders to delegate for the first time. Once that happens, governance will have a much stronger baseline participation rate, even if some people stop delegating after the incentives end. (also worth adding: if incentives were introduced, the non-delegating portion of the token supply would decrease dramatically)

From the top of my head, almost all LDO delegated at the start of the delegation program (August 2024) have already been moved. This is not a proper analysis; just a quick observation.
Overall, I think one-time delegation incentives (not recurring) could be a reasonable way to maintain a healthy level of governance participation. But I’m not convinced it’s the best possible proposal here;

To me, Lido governance is already accountable to LDO holders and stakers thanks to Dual Governance. And the Foundations have consistently shown themselves to be a reliable, value-driven counterparty. Because of that, I don’t see participation rates as a core strategic focus, more as an operational issue to be managed.

2 Likes

Thanks for sharing GOOSE-3! It’s challenging to provide detailed feedback on something that is both so complex and requires an incredible amount of context.

But, general feedback:

  1. Congrats on all the success so far in dominating the decentralized liquid staking vertical. It’s very clear that it’s in a much more mature state and the juice to squeeze out of it is decreasing.

Question: How confident are we feeling in Lido retaining it’s current share of the market vs. losses to CEX’s with strong top of funnel distribution? Has there been an effort to become the cbETH, etc. for all of the CEX’s who have no interest in deploying their own staked versions? Are margins too tight? Is there a way to improve the margins?

General worry: staying focused on the staking vertical and winning it (or not losing it) while adding the horizontal expansion.

  1. Contracting while expanding: most of the above is about “expansion” but often “contracting” is the key to creating time, space, and focus to expand. What initiatives exist to remove initiatives that are not adding enough value.
  2. Decreasing headcount → has begun, makes sense, reduces costs, FORCES focus
  3. Centralizing offchain processes that don’t require votes → has begun and increases speed
  4. Previously deprecating staking on chains that lost revenue → Done. Polygon, etc.

Is there anything else that might require a hard look? Managing core, vaults, earn, dvt, csm, etc. and the debt of managing all of those requires an insane amount of resources. What else can be removed?

  1. Small Bets: Fast, Focused, and Scalable
    This is great, but unlikely to work within the current Lido operational setup. You can’t have your cake and eat it to. Every approval, every review that would be required from a Lido Foundation Labs executive would slow down and constrict the process. You need to externalise this. It adds risk but increases the reward. You simply have to ensure that Lido and LDO have upside in these small bets.

**Overall: **
Aggressive and ambitious, clearly we are trying to put a foot out of staking to expand our prospective growth. I encourage that via externalising small bets while ensuring we don’t take our eye off the prize regarding the staking vertical itself. Balancing both will be challenging and risky.

You have my vote and support.

8 Likes

Question: How confident are we feeling in Lido retaining it’s current share of the market vs. losses to CEX’s with strong top of funnel distribution? Has there been an effort to become the cbETH, etc. for all of the CEX’s who have no interest in deploying their own staked versions? Are margins too tight? Is there a way to improve the margins?

There has been an effort to do that, and there are also ongoing efforts in supporting the listing of stETH on large CEXes which could be considered as having competing liquid products – although I’d argue that these CEXes already leave a lot of money on the table in the form of significant fees on trading volume, custody, and integrations of things like stVaults for bespoke DeFi products for their customers by not integrating stETH.

Over the past year, stETH has been listed and continues to be added to many robust exchanges globally, so teh remaining “the CEXes which have no interest in deploying their own staked versions” aren’t that many and I’m not sure how well much value there is left (also take into account that every such integration has integration and liquidity considerations and costs). I would say the chief hurdle for the remaining notable exchanges is lack of regulatory clarity in some jurisdictions where these said CEXes operate, and that these CEXes also offer “native staking” products (not LSTs), which they fear may be cannibalized by stETH. In the case of the latter argument, stVaults would be a suitable way for these CEXes to retain both the ability to run the validators, retain the user, and capture the potential value differential by adding stETH.

Is there anything else that might require a hard look? Managing core, vaults, earn, dvt, csm, etc. and the debt of managing all of those requires an insane amount of resources. What else can be removed?

It’s being looked at on a semi-consistent basis I’d say, as are considerations around what synergies can be found via consolidating similar operations/flows/scope to create capacity for bets. The evolution of Core via changes to the Curated Module into a more sustainable and more hands-off system is a part of this effort, for example, and I think there’s room for some more of this kind of change as well – stay tuned!

6 Likes

First of all, thanks for putting this proposal together.

Topic of the year: How do we navigate the tension between maintaining the current setup, continue making it safe and helping Ethereum (which have been largely achieved, but need to be upheld or we lose all competitive advantage) and finding new exciting avenues for revenue and relevance.

We get it, infra is boring and It’s cool to do hot shit in DeFi, but DeFi at large is a huge animal that needs to be scoped better.

Going step by step:

On the part of leading with staking I have no major problem with.

  • stVaults have come so far we are not about to abandon them now, but the real meat is the ETP/Fs.
  • My view is that we should really lean with all we have to ETPs.
    1. And I get it, it’s more of a BD effort instead of a titanic engineering feat, which is what Lido is used to, but it’s time to really take all that credibility we have built by being so safe and so established and leverage it beyond the boundaries of the crypto native ecosystem into TradFi.
  • Note that this seems to be reflected in the corresponding EGG also submitted with the GOOSE :white_check_mark:

Also, let me be annoying with the stVaults as B2B2X: It’s great for distribution but encourages “private operator cluster + my compliance stack” rather than broad, permissionless operator diversity. We have spent so much time building CSM and diversifying the node operator set, just to push on the other side for big guns to create their products? How can we plug in the CSM set into “white label vaults”. And yes, I know it’s not white label but the point I’m trying to make is that we need a connection between making distribution easier for partners and connecting them with a decentralized node operator set.

Another way of raising this point would be: 1M ETH staked in stVaults sounds good but: What percentage of total protocol stake do we want in stVaults vs CSM / SDVT / Core, and how do we prevent the B2B side from eating all the oxygen and regressing back to a more centralized Lido?

Regarding the New Products section, I am afraid I agree with BCV’s analysis:

I’m not trying to be a naysayer, we have to try new things, but I would be wary of trying to go head on with existing established protocols and find where we can be valuable.

For this, I half-disagree with Anthony though:

Half disagree because I actually think externalizing these bets is a good idea. Nevertheless, Lido has excellent track record on finding this ONE thing that is hard to do safely at scale and executing, and at least some resources should be invested in finding this ONE thing in DeFi (maybe RWA?) that Lido can execute better than anyone and building on the experience of the first product, stETH.

Overall, I would encourage to lean ETP/Fs, think careful about the Node Operator set and how to keep it decentralized, be careful on spending resources wildly on DeFi but experimenting, (maybe externalizing?) and waiting until that opportunity to replicate success in the proven Lido formula.

6 Likes

Snapshot vote started

The GOOSE 2025 cycle: Lido DAO goals for 2026 Snapshot has started! Please cast your votes before Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:00:00 GMT :folded_hands:

I think the Ethereum staker set should have the right to choose the decentralization ratio of their stake distributions. The Lido protocol shouldn’t interfere with those preferences, since stakers are the actual owners of the Ethereum network and the entire user base of Lido. Lido should simply provide an additional option for those who want greater decentralization through Lido Core.

1 Like

Hey Lanski, thanks for your comments.

I will take a pass at giving my view on your points regarding the staking related parts of the proposal.

I fully agree that there is a significant opportunity here, and I think the launch with WisdomTree is a huge endorsement of the fact that Lido Core is indeed institutional grade today.

This is something that I expect will be a great touchpoint for other large institutional stakers that were otherwise hesitant to utilize a distributed validator set, and I’m optimistic that this will lead to a nice rebound in growth for the protocol into 2026.

My view here is that the story for stVaults is still very early days (e.g. going live shortly), and given the significant flexibility for what can be built on top of them, there are definitely exploration paths open that could lead to connecting more distributed Node Operators sets to stakers via vaults.

I think it’s important to note however that the majority of staked Ethereum today is staked “natively” without access to liquidity, and this segment of the market has been growing as a percentage of total Ethereum staked.

stVaults target a segment of the market that to some extent is inaccessible for Lido Core. It bridges the gap between Node Operators that have their own clients with specific economic terms, while at the most simple level providing those clients with a better product via the ability to mint stETH optionally. stVaults can unblock part of the illiquid segment of staked ETH and “softly incentivize” it to be more decentralized by organizing minting capacity in tiers according to the risk framework.

The tier and category mechanisms as part of stVaults limit the size of a given Node Operator’s ability to mint stETH, and the best reserve ratio terms are reserved for verified multi-operator DVT clusters, i.e. incentivizing decentralization.

I also think that the ability to build differentiated products out of the box with DeFi wrapper will allow for much healthier competition dynamics between the longer-tail of professional operators vs. the larger ones. The combination of stETH liquidity, integrations, and tooling for creating staking related products has significant potential in my view for smaller Node Operators to create new primitives that find PMF in a way that was nearly impossible before.

The stake distribution trends of stVaults are definitely something to keep an eye on, however given how early we are and the tremendous progress that Lido Core has made in decentralizing the Node Operator set, I think there is a healthy margin of safety here in the medium term to wait and see.

Once V3 is fully launched, the mintable capacity of stVaults is limited to 30% of Lido Core, at least initially. Considering that stVaults are completely permissionless to launch (e.g. home stakers can use them) and given the fact that staker and Node Operator interactions with the protocol are quite different vs. Lido Core, it seems that there is the potential for upside to that split (while balancing risks related to stETH minting).

In stVault’s current design, there is a symbiotic relationship between stVaults and Lido Core. If the size of Lido Core decreases, the maximum capacity of stVaults will also have to decrease. This means that as long as Lido Core continues on a path of growth and balanced decentralization in regards to the Node Operator set, the overall protocol should remain very decentralized from the Node Operator perspective.

My hope is that we will continue to see institutional products look to Lido Core to take advantage of the innate benefits that a high performing, distributed validator set provides. If that is the case, the amount of permissionless operators and home stakers running validators via Lido will continue to grow.

The DAO has already voted to increase the share limit of CSM to 10%, and my personal belief is that following the more aligned economics introduced in CSMv2, the share of the module should increase further from there in the future. In addition, I think continued advancements in areas like DVT and the additional flexibility that CMv2 and ValMart provide will lead to other routes to continue improving on both the Node Operator and infrastructure decentralization of the protocol, even in the event that large B2B style Node Operators run large amounts of stake via stVaults.

Large Node Operators and Centralized Exchanges will continue to offer staking products outside of the Lido ecosystem, however given the stVault minting limits and relationship between stVaults and Lido Core, the incremental participation of centralized staking entities will be both limited and incentivized to run that stake via more decentralized avenues.

8 Likes

Hey there!
Really appreciate your feedback and the valid points for a discussion.

I’ll focus on the quoted question and will share my personal vision here, as i this is as quite heavy question & risk highlighted and that i’ve also considering contributing on stVaults design.

In the first part “What percentage of total protocol stake do we want in stVaults vs CSM / SDVT / Core” my personal preference is, well: as high as possible.

And this is definitely a hot take, but with some nuances:
Firstly, as stated in Lido v3 Whitepaper RFC Lido Core is a backbone of stVaults design, providing baseline institutional grade risk-rewards staking profile on the market with deep liquidity.

Therefore what i mean by “as high as possible” is stVaults on top of Lido Core as a flexible customizable staking setups utilizing existing stable, again, baseline.

There are different actors within staking ecosystem, and they have different preferences. And even the best product (which I personally consider Lido Core) couldn’t suit all the needs - and that’s absolutely normal.

So what i would see as a purpose and as a win for stVaults is creating multiple products, representing different actors preferences on the market on top of Lido Core as a fundamental layer within the system.

And why do i think it’s important?

That’s connected with the second part of the question:

" how do we prevent the B2B side from eating all the oxygen and regressing back to a more centralized Lido"

The simple answer is - the same as Lido’ve prevented centralization of the stake when it was created: by providing the product that is best from users perspective and creating the incentives for decentralization within.
But this time on the different segment(s) of the staking market - which already may be starved on oxygen

The current design (Risk Assessment Framework for stVaults) is already favoring more decentralised setups and disincentivize stake concentration, with more ways to gover the market stated in Core Pool Sustainability Incentives section in Lido V3 Whitepaper.

From this scope i don’t see stVaults and Lido Core competing for stake (or share within protocol): it’s different layers for different actors to utilize on the open market, while DAO provides incentives focused on fostering healthy staking market

5 Likes

As long as vanilla stETH itself is decently competitive offer (at the moment it is), balancing stVaults vs stETH is as easy as setting a ceiling on mintable stETH from vaults.

This would sound too self-assured but I think I’ve done a decent job of it tbh, where we’re not very restrictive and provide more value than detract with constraints. I’ve got experience with doing things like that: Lido itself had a similar history with P2P, for example. It’s a problem but you can balance things out in a good way for internal projects.

6 Likes

Overall, I’m cautiously supportive of Goose-3. It seems well-calibrated to Lido’s current scale and complexity.

That said, I’d feel more comfortable if the DAO explicitly treated this as an iterative phase rather than a fixed end-state, with a clear expectation that the model can be revisited as conditions change.