2026 Ecosystem Grant gRequest (EGG): Executing GOOSE-3

upd: This proposal was updated on 10 Dec 2025.

This proposal has been updated to reflect changes in the Discretionary Cap (from $14.4M to $16.2M) and the total Foundations’ grant request (from $58.2M to $60.0M). The original amounts are replaced with the revised figures. A detailed explanation of why these changes were made is provided in the comment below.

TL;DR

  • The 2026 Ecosystem Grant Request (EGG) is submitted to ensure protocol resilience, security and continuity, and to support Lido DAO’s long-term treasury growth.
  • The 2026 EGG is a consolidated submission from Lido Labs Foundation, Lido Ecosystem Foundation, and Lido Alliance BORG (collectively the “Foundations”), aligning their mandates and execution plans to maintain protocol operations and deliver the proposed GOOSE-3 goals:
    • Expand the Staking Ecosystem
    • Ensure Protocol Resilience: Lido Core Upgrade
    • Scale New DAO Revenue Streams: Lido Earn
    • Explore Vertical Expansion and Real-World Business Applications.
  • This request is structured into Core for protocol maintenance and Growth for new strategic initiatives with low-variance and high-variance components.
  • The Foundations request $58.2M $60.0M in total:
    • $43.8M baseline amount ($26.9M – Core; $16.9M – Growth)
    • $14.4M $16.2M discretionary amount cap under the Growth Part.
  • Projected baseline revenue amounts to $48.7M $50.0M, with upside potential from Growth initiatives and allocation of discretionary expenses.
  • Revenue projections are based on mildly conservative assumptions: ETH at $2,712 (2-year median price between Nov 2023 and Oct 2025), 2.93% staking APR, total ETH staked +15% to 41M ETH with Lido’s share rising to 27.3%, including 10.1M ETH staked via Lido Core and 1.05M ETH staked via stVaults.
  • Baseline net income is expected to be +$4.9M +$6.2 in 2026 (Core: +$8.1M; Growth: –$3.2M –$1.9M)
  • An additional request may be submitted to the DAO for the GOOSE-3 Big Bet if a validated, billion-dollar-scale opportunity emerges.
  • GOOSE-3 and the 2026 EGG are included in a single voting slot to directly tie funding to objectives and simplify governance.

1. Introduction

This 2026 Ecosystem Grant gRequest (“EGG”) sets out the funding required to execute GOOSE-3 strategic plan for 2026 to support the Lido DAO (the “DAO”) in furthering the Lido protocol (“Lido” or “Protocol”).

The DAO’s mission of building a secure, decentralized, and simple liquid staking protocol for Ethereum is largely complete (see Lido on Ethereum Scorecard). The proposed focus for the Foundations in 2026 shifts towards evolving Lido’s position from a single-product protocol focused on liquid staking to an innovative organization with a product portfolio by expanding the product offering, creating new revenue streams and ensuring long-term protocol resilience. These proposals are designed to support both:

  • Vertical expansion: building end-user products that capture more value, deepen relationships with existing user base and increase strategic resilience;
  • Horizontal expansion: developing products related to stablecoins and other asset classes to broaden demand and diversify revenue.

The integration of the EGG and the Guided Open Objective Setting Exercise (GOOSE) proposal into a single voting slot aims to give LDO holders a clear mapping between requested funds, proposed strategic objectives, and measurable outcomes. This approach simplifies governance and strengthens accountability.

This submission has been prepared by the Lido Labs Foundation and reflects a collective request from Lido Labs Foundation, Lido Ecosystem Foundation and Lido Alliance BORG. These are independent entities, each of which has previously received grants from the Lido DAO to support its specific mandate towards the Lido protocol.

Since their mandates intersect and require ongoing collaboration, the 2026 EGG is unified and reflects how the Foundations propose to jointly deliver protocol maintenance and execute on the GOOSE-3 goals.

2. Foundations Grant Request 2026

The 2026 EGG consists of two components: (i) Core, funding protocol-critical maintenance and operations, and (ii) Growth, funding the execution of the four proposed GOOSE-3 goals. Growth spend is divided into:

  • baseline costs (which are predictable low-variance spending with high likelihood of occurrence, such as maintenance, operations and validated initiatives), and

  • discretionary costs (which are high-variance optional or conditional allocations with uncertain realization, such as reserves and growth allocations that may be deployed only under certain conditions, and have a moderate or lower likelihood of occurrence).

The Foundations request $60.0M in total to execute Protocol maintenance and GOOSE-3 goals in 2026. This includes $43.8M in baseline spend: $26.9M (61%) for the Core and $16.9M (39%) for the Growth. And discretionary allocations for the Growth part include $16.2M.

If the proposal is supported, funding for disbursement to finance the Foundations would be requested from the DAO via Easy Track motions to the operational multisigs.
In the event that unused grant funds remain at the end of the period, they will be returned to the DAO Treasury.

2.1 Core (Protocol Maintenance) - Baseline costs

The Core funds the stability, reliability and security of the Lido protocol. It remains the anchor of Lido protocol resilience, DAO revenue stability and long-term sustainability.

The Lido protocol has maintained a zero-incident record related to the safety of users’ funds, a track record that reflects an uncompromising commitment to security and operational excellence and explains why the majority of Core spend is directed toward R&D and audits.

Maintenance covers the day-to-day operation of the protocol: keeping smart contracts and offchain components up to date with Ethereum upgrades, running 24/7 monitoring and alerting, providing tooling and support for hundreds of node operators. The request funds the engineering, DevOps, risk and support functions that deliver these activities, as well as the audit and infrastructure layers that enable them to meet strict reliability and security standards.

While variable costs in this category remain relatively low, the request includes essential allocations for audits and market-level base compensation, needed to operate a protocol of this scale and complexity. These costs are fundamental to ensuring continuous performance, rapid issue resolution and proactive risk management.

If protocol-related workloads decrease during the year (for instance, if certain upgrades are completed ahead of schedule or deprioritized), capacity may be reallocated towards Growth initiatives. This flexibility ensures optimal utilization of skilled resources and supports the broader DAO treasury’s revenue growth objective for 2026.

2.2 Growth – Baseline costs

2.2.1 Expand the Staking Ecosystem

To deliver the Expand the Staking Ecosystem goal, the Foundations request $10.8M. These funds will be directed toward strengthening adoption of stETH and stVaults, with a particular focus on Lido V3 stVaults and institutional, ETF/ETP and DeFi integrations. Funding will support the build-out and iteration of the stVaults infrastructure, onboarding of key institutional and DeFi partners, and running targeted go-to-market efforts to drive adoption.

Most of the costs under this goal are low-variance R&D expenses ($2.5M), including compensation for the stVaults development and audits work ($0.8M reflected in Indirect Costs). Sales and marketing costs ($1.2M) support expansion of the stVaults and broader stETH offering, including ETF/ETP distribution.

Lido V3 stVaults represent one of Lido’s largest strategic investments. Following the launch of the initial stVaults and a period of live operation, the Foundations will need to determine whether this product line should remain a focus of active development and scaling, or transition into a maintenance posture on supporting existing users and integration. This decision is expected around Q2 2026, once stVaults have been fully rolled out and progress can be assessed.

The Growth part also includes a request for funding to support the Rewards Share Program. At the moment, the Rewards-Share Committee continues an existing grant (3,000 stETH until exhausted or the program is stopped) to further help raise liquid staking technology and liquid staking tokens such as stETH awareness. Next year, an additional ~1k ETH will be required to cover current and potential commitments, which amounts to $2.9M based on median ETH price over the last 2 years used in the current EGG.

Liquidity Costs represent expenses aimed at strategically boosting liquidity in crucial stETH applications, supporting potential integrations that can strengthen the stETH ecosystem, and implementing temporary liquidity measures with clearly defined objectives. This category includes future expenses tied to existing commitments or commitments with high likelihood of occurrence. The total amount of such expenses is $3.2M.

2.2.2 Ensure Protocol Resilience: Lido Core Upgrade

To deliver the Ensure Protocol Resilience: Lido Core Upgrade goal, the Foundations request $3.0M. These funds will be directed toward delivering Curated Module v2 (CMv2) and Staking Router v3 (SRv3) with ValMart — a validator-market built directly into the routing layer that replaces round-robin allocation with a system where operator fees, validator performance and decentralization metrics determine how stake is routed.

Almost the entire allocation consists of low-variance R&D and audit expenses ($2.7M combined), covering the full design, implementation, maintenance and audits of CMv2, SRv3 and ValMart.

This includes implementing CMv2 features such as operator bonding and performance-linked allocation and exit priority; SRv3 improvements including granular deposit and withdrawal controls, stake reallocation between operators and modules, and balance-based accounting across validator types; the staged transition from the current Curated Module to CMv2; and the audits required to safely ship the upgraded routing layer.

2.2.3 Scale New DAO Revenue Streams: Lido Earn

To deliver the Scale New DAO Revenue Streams: Lido Earn goal, the Foundations request $1.8M. The allocation supports the development of Lido Earn into a multi-segment product suite that serves different yield appetites and risk profiles. In 2026, work under this goal will focus on expanding and maintaining Earn vaults for DeFi users, restakers, stablecoin savers, passive earners and treasury managers.

Almost the entire allocation consists of baseline R&D and audit expenses ($1.6M combined), covering the full design, implementation and maintenance of the Earn product line.

Most costs under this goal are low-variance R&D expenses. It is expected to:

  • Design, launch and maintain Earn vaults across the targeted user segments listed above;
  • Implement and support the DeFi and DVT-based strategies used by these vaults;
  • Develop and maintain ERC-4626 wrappers for Earn vaults so they can be used in external structured DeFi products;
  • Maintain and update the smart contracts and related infrastructure required for Earn to function as a stable product line for the DAO;
  • Facilitate integrations and support distribution through channel partners, enabling Earn vaults to be embedded, listed, and promoted across external interfaces and partner ecosystems.

For Lido Earn, a separate pool of high-variance costs is requested as part of the Conditional allocations with uncertain realization (see Section 3), with the actual spend depending on the product’s performance and traction. This reserve is intended to cover potential marketing-related expenses, business development and collaboration with partners, notably to source vault incentives into Earn products.

2.2.4 Explore Vertical Expansion and Real-World Business Applications

To deliver the Explore Vertical Expansion and Real-World Business Applications goal, the Foundations request $1.3M. This allocation supports the small-bet track defined in GOOSE-3: fast, lean initiatives with strict validation gates. Only experiments demonstrating clear traction and revenue potential will be eligible to scale and receive additional allocation. The intent is exploration of optionality, not permanent overhead.

2.3 The Big Bet Funding

According to the GOOSE-3 goal Explore Vertical Expansion and Real-World Business Applications, the Foundations will explore a potential “Big Bet” – a major expansion with billion-dollar revenue potential.
As the required resources cannot be reliably estimated today, no funding is requested at this time. The Foundations may return to the DAO with a separate request if a strategically compelling opportunity emerges, with the size of any such request determined by the specifics of that opportunity.

3. Discretionary Costs

Conditional allocations with uncertain realization

To deliver on the GOOSE-3 goals Scale New DAO Revenue Streams: Lido Earn & Explore Vertical Expansion and Real-World Business Applications aimed at expanding Lido’s product portfolio beyond staking and continue development of the stVaults product line (if conditions for continuous active investment are met), the Foundations plan to undertake a wide pool of initiatives.

To adequately budget for associated expenses, these projects undergo an initial assessment to determine their expected utilization rate and to classify the corresponding portion as either baseline or discretionary costs. These utilization assumptions for each product line and expense category inform the allocations included in this EGG Request.

While the total discretionary costs could potentially reach $27.4M in the event of a highly positive market response, we are requesting an initial allocation of only $16.2M at this stage.The Foundations intend these funds to be held in reserve as part of a pool to be allocated based on the market response to the new initiatives. Such reserves will only be deployed when predefined product milestones (e.g. TVL, revenue run-rate, partner commitments) are met and may not be fully utilised. Unsuccessful experiments will be sunset, in line with the execution model described in GOOSE-3.

Therefore, the total grant requested for the Growth discretionary costs is $16.2M.


These allocations include:

  • Potential liquidity costs
  • Expenses related to potential institutional integrations
  • Costs of potential new hires that may be required as products grow
  • Incentives and bonuses that are closely tied to the performance of individual products
  • LEGO grants to third parties, which may be issued if the Foundations deem them necessary
  • Costs of auditing new products, which may arise in case of success
  • Legal and marketing expenses, which also depend on the success of the chosen growth directions
  • This also includes a buffer to allow for decision-making, should the need arise.

4. Projected impact on DAO Treasury

4.1 Main economic assumptions

The 2026 EGG is built upon a baseline scenario, which incorporates a set of assumptions designed to facilitate realistic and prudent financial planning.

Baseline scenario

  • Cautiously optimistic on growth
    • Total ETH staked grows 15% to 41M ETH, as a result of institutional adoption and expected regulatory approval of US ETF staking
    • Lido Core grows 17.3% to 10.1M ETH staked, driven by new integrations - ETPs, custodians, and exchanges
    • stVaults grow to 1.05M ETH staked as node operators, wallets, custodians, L2 ecosystems and other integrators build staking and structured DeFi products on top of stVaults infrastructure
    • Thus, Lido’s market share is expected to reach 27.3% (compared to the current Lido market share of 24.1%).
  • Realistic on DAO fee rate changes:
    • DAO share of staking rewards weighted across the Core protocol modules increases by ~20%, from 5.02% to 6.02%, as a result of changes proposed under the GOOSE-3 “Ensure Protocol Resilience: Lido Core Upgrade” goal, and CSM reaching 10% of Lido Core
    • DAO blended share on stVaults assumed at 3.59%, consisting of 1% flat infra fee + 6.5% liquidity fee on minted stETH, assuming 65% users mint conservatively (15% of ETH staked) and 35% users mint aggressively (95% of ETH staked)
  • Cautiously pessimistic on ETH/USD price = $2,712, the median price over the last 2 years, chosen to ensure resilience even during market turbulence. At the date of publishing, the median price is ~$2,842, which represents only a minor deviation (within 5%) from the price used for the financial planning.

ETH price remains the most impactful variable for Lido DAO’s revenue projections. It is considered that the assumptions underlying the baseline scenario render it appropriately cautious.

4.2 Overall Lido DAO revenue impact


The figures shown above represent cumulative DAO revenue for 2026. GOOSE-3 instead defines product goals in terms of year-end annual recurring revenue (ARR), so these numbers are not directly comparable.

Based on baseline spend and baseline revenue assumptions, approximately +$8.1M in net impact for 2026 is expected to be generated in Core and -$1.9M in net impact in Growth, resulting in treasury net impact of +$6.2M. This strengthens the treasury and preserves long-term optionality for future initiatives.

It is important to emphasize that all revenue mentioned belongs and flows directly to Lido DAO’s treasury and not to any of the Foundations, as the Protocol is governed by the DAO. Any revenue figures included in this proposal are only projections based on the assumptions laid out and do not constitute commitments or guarantees. These projections depend heavily on multiple external and internal factors which are unpredictable and fall outside of the control of the Foundations, including market conditions, product adoption and the execution timelines. Accordingly, no revenue targets are being promised as part of this EGG. All figures should be treated as indicative estimates rather than firm expectations.

4.2.1 Core Revenue

The core staking product – Lido protocol is the primary source of revenue for the Lido DAO.
Core revenue is estimated to reach 35 061 kUSD, taking into consideration the following assumptions:

4.2.2 Growth Revenue

The figures below represent a high-confidence baseline based only on existing projects; internal targets are higher, and the Foundations are working on additional initiatives under the 2026 goals outlined in the GOOSE-3 proposal. Discretionary expenses associated with these additional initiatives, if allocated, are expected to generate extra revenue beyond this baseline.

4.3 Risk Profile

The risk profile of the grant request is shaped by three design choices:

  • Core first protection: protocol safety and continuity remain fully funded under all scenarios
  • Conditional deployment: reserves set aside for discretionary expenses are unlocked based on product traction, market conditions and clear milestones. If those conditions are not met, these funds remain in the Lido DAO Treasury.
  • Downside flexibility: Treasury depletion is avoided by prioritizing the Core funding and scaling back Growth; high-variance spend is reduced or delayed, and lower-confidence initiatives are paused first if DAO revenues soften or market conditions weaken.

This structure ensures the DAO strengthens its treasury while executing GOOSE-3 in a risk-aware way.

5. Closing words

The Foundations request $60.0M to secure protocol continuity and deliver GOOSE-3 goals in 2026: $43.8M in baseline ($26.9M Core, $16.9M Growth) and $16.2M in discretionary funding deployed only if milestones are met.

Core funding ensures uninterrupted operation of the Lido protocol, the DAO’s primary revenue engine, across engineering, infrastructure, validator operations, and security. This layer is fully protected under all market conditions.

Growth funding targets GOOSE-3 execution: expanding the staking ecosystem, shipping Core upgrades (CMv2, SRv3, ValMart), scaling Lido Earn, and running selective vertical expansion bets. These unlock new DAO revenue lines, deepen product-market fit, and strengthen DAO resilience.

Under baseline assumptions, the DAO remains net impact positive. Conditional reserves are gated by measurable traction such as TVL, revenue, integrations ensuring disciplined capital deployment and downside protection.

This proposal strengthens protocol safety, funds strategic delivery, and preserves optionality for the next chapter. Lido now has the opportunity to shape not only the future of staking, but the future of onchain financial infrastructure.


upd. 10 December 2025
This proposal has been updated to reflect changes in the Discretionary Cap (from $14.4M to $16.2M) and the total Foundations’ grant request (from $58.2M to $60.0M). The original amounts are replaced with the revised figures.

Why these changes were made:

Following the Curated Module Fee Changes vote, the default operator fee in the Curated Module will shift to 3.5% from 5% previously. Until Curated Module v2 introduces automation, extra-tier (Extra Effort and Client Team Tier) rewards above the base 3.5% fee must be distributed manually. To enable this, 487.5 ETH ($1.3M) are requested for the Reward Share Committee to process these. This additional request does not change the expected financial outcome for the DAO or the protocol, as it is a consequence of a temporary manual process for Lido Core until CMv2 is live (note: this change in Lido Core is a part of anticipated additional net revenue for the year (from $7,012k to $8,334k) resulting from fee adjustments.

Additionally, 150 ETH ($0.5M) is requested to fund the Lido stVaults Rewards Share, which the Rewards Share Committee will also process. This Rewards Share is intended to support the adoption of stVaults and help grow Lido’s penetration in the low-risk staking segment.

In total, this adds 637.5 ETH to the request, increasing Discretionary Costs by $1.8M.

16 Likes

To support the decision-making process for voters, we are also preparing:

  • the income statement for the DAO for 2025 and 2026 (projected), and
  • a comparison to the 2025 EGG request.

This information will be published as soon as it is ready.

8 Likes

Note: Please note that the EGG proposal has been updated in the part related to the Discretionary Costs on 10 Dec 2025.
The comments below reflect the most recent changes.

Comments to EGG 2026 Proposal

To support the EGG 2026 proposal and assist voters in making informed decisions, Lido Labs Foundation has prepared a set of financial analyses that includes:

  • consolidated forecasted net impact for the DAO Treasury for 2026 ;
  • a net impact on the DAO Treasury for 2025 (with December figures presented as projections);
  • a comparison of the current EGG 2026 Request with last year’s EGG requests.

Key assumptions on projections are the same as in EGG request:

  • ETH at $2,712 (2-year median price between Nov 2023 and Oct 2025),
  • 2.93% staking APR,
  • total ETH staked +15% to 41M ETH with Lido’s share rising to 27.3%, including 10.1M ETH staked via Lido Core and 1.05M ETH staked via stVaults.
  • The current projection does not account for any potential impact from Liquid BuyBacks, because:
    • The DAO has not yet made a decision regarding the buyback program
    • currently proposed buyback parameters would not be triggered under the conservative ETH price assumptions used in the model.

TL;DR

  • Operational impact on DAO Treasury is –$6.0M in 2026 under conservative ETH price assumption of $2,712, due to the investment in growth initiatives. Treasury stETH holdings decline to 30.7k stETH (–9%).
  • Lido Core generates +$8.1M total surplus even under conservative ETH price assumption.
  • Gross staking rewards decrease –8% YoY in USD but grow +2.5% in ETH, indicating that the decline is driven by the ETH price assumption rather than performance.
  • Net revenue from staking fees grows +10% YoY in USD terms due to the GOOSE-3 Growth initiatives such as Core Upgrade and stVaults.
  • Lido Earn and New Bets add $4.7M to 2026 DAO revenue, diversifying revenue streams.
  • Operating Expenses decrease ~17% YoY, from $32.4M to $26.9M, following cost optimization and refocusing Core spending on protocol-critical functions.

Comparison of 2025 Actuals and the Proposed 2026 EGG Request

Below is a table comparing the projections for 2026 with the 2025 actuals (preliminary, as of December 8).

Note: The table below is divided into two categories: DAO Revenue and Foundations’ Expenses. The 2026 EGG Request provides funding for the Foundations’ Expenses. All revenue generated through the Foundations’ activities flows back to the Lido DAO and is reflected under DAO Revenue.

[1] Net revenue from staking fees (staking revenue to DAO)

The projected decline -8% in the fee base (Fee – Gross Staking Rewards and Gross Revenue) indicated in USD compared to the actual 2025 figures is primarily driven by the conservative ETH price assumptions used in the 2026 revenue forecasts, and is offset by improvements in Cost of Revenue (staking rewards to NOs), so that Net revenue from staking fees (staking revenue to the DAO) remains resilient. The 2026 revenue projections are intentionally cautious: although an increase in Lido’s market share next year is expected, the Lido Protocol Core revenue for 2026 is set at $35.1M which is below the actual 2025 Lido Protocol revenue of $41M. This conservative stance (built on 2-year median ETH price assumptions and cautious APR estimates) ensures resilience in various market conditions and avoids overstating expected performance.
Growth-oriented projects like stVaults, the Lido Core Upgrade, and additional income from activities under ‘Expand the Staking Ecosystem’ goal are expected to add approximately $10.2M to the projected Lido Protocol Core revenue. Thus total expectations on revenue from staking are set at the level $45.3M for 2026 (vs $41.0M in 2025).

To isolate the impact of the ETH price assumption in Staking Revenue, it is necessary to analyze the 2026 projected figures relative to the 2025 data in ETH terms:

Expected Gross Staking Rewards for 2026 are 285.5 kETH, including 15.4 kETH from stVaults, compared to 278.6 kETH in 2025 (+2.5%). A similar level of change is expected for Gross Revenue in ETH. On top of that, a significant impact on DAO Net Revenue is expected from the Lido Core upgrade, which is assumed to significantly decrease Cost of Revenue line (changing staking rewards to NOs). Total effect on projected net revenue is +3.2 kETH in Growth part.

[2] Other Revenue

Additional revenue in 2026 is expected from new products such as Lido Earn and New Bets as well as from treasury management activities. Together, these inflows are projected to contribute an additional $8.6M.

[2.1] Revenue from Lido Earn and New Bets is based on assumptions described in EGG’2026 proposal.
[2.2] The revenue from Treasury Management is included based on the DAO-approved proposal TMC-6: ‘Convert DAO Treasury stablecoins into sUSDS and update the configuration on Easy Track and Aragon Finance accordingly”. Other revenue also includes Staking Rewards on Treasury stETH holdings which are expected at the amount $2.5M in 2026 vs $2.3M in 2025.

[3] Expenses

The structure and composition of expenses in 2026 will change as a result of investments into strategic growth objectives: the total spending on Growth and Liquidity will nearly double compared to the previous year, and, in addition, the expense structure will now include allocations from the Discretionary Costs pool (the discretionary part of the Growth budget).
Core expenses are expected to decrease by roughly 17% year-over-year: operating costs in 2025 amount to $32.4M, while the 2026 Core baseline assumes $26.9M. This reduction is achieved without compromising protocol maintenance or security, indicating improved cost efficiency and operational discipline. As a result, Core profitability increases meaningfully: under the 2026 baseline, the DAO is expected to generate $8.1M of Core total surplus for the Lido Protocol segment, even under conservative ETH price assumptions.
To support expansion, Growth spending increases not only in baseline costs but also in expected high variable expenses, requested as Discretionary Costs pool for hard-to-predict or unexpected costs. Given the high variability of such expenses, they may not be fully utilized over the next year; however, they are included in the current analysis to demonstrate the most conservative approach to forecasting results.
Discretionary Costs are the primary driver of the potential negative total financial outcome 2026. Consequently, the forecasted net loss for the coming year is attributable to the DAO’s strategic investment initiatives as well as the deliberately conservative assumptions applied in estimating forward-looking financial performance.

[4] Treasury

The DAO Treasury is projected to decline from $118.7M in 2025 to $112.6M in 2026 (–5% YoY). This change is primarily driven by a reduction in the USD value of the stETH Treasury position, which decreases from $91.2M to $85.1M (–7%). For comparability the model applies a budget assumption of $2,712 per stETH, based on the two-year median price. This conservative valuation framework significantly influences the USD-denominated Treasury figures.

In nominal terms, the DAO’s stETH holdings decrease from 33,628 to 31,365 stETH (–7%), reflecting the planned use of stETH to fund operations and growth initiatives throughout 2026.

The stablecoin portion of the Treasury remains constant at $27.5M in the model. We assume a stablecoin reserve of similar size in 2026 for modeling purposes. The Treasury Management Committee oversees any adjustments to the reserve under its established framework; this table reflects a steady balance for clarity and comparability.

Comparative Analysis of EGG 2025 and EGG 2026

The most important change introduced this year is the consolidation of grant requests into one unified submission. In 2025, grants were distributed across multiple independent committees, each with its own budget, processes, and reporting.
Here is the list of grants requested in 2025:

  • $11.1M for Q1 ’25 expenses
  • $34.88M for Q2–Q4 ’25 expenses (per Lido Labs Foundation request)
  • $10.61M for Q2–Q4 ’25 expenses (per Lido Ecosystem Foundation request)
  • $0.3M for Q1–Q4 ’25 expenses (per Lido Alliance BORG)
  • $0.5M LEGO Committee ongoing grant with quarterly renewals
  • $2M bug bounty (per Lido Contributors Group request)
  • $8.5M Liquidity Observation Lab 6-month grant
  • $0.3M Delegate Incentivization Programme grant
  • $0.2M Community Lifeguards Initiative (CLI) Quarterly Budget Request
  • Remaining balance from 3,000 stETH for the Rewards Share Program approved in 2024

This fragmentation made it difficult to assess total spend, track performance across workstreams, and maintain consistent financial controls.

In 2026, the DAO moved to a unified model in which all committee-aligned workstreams are organized under the Lido Labs Foundation, Lido Ecosystem Foundation, and Lido Alliance BORG. As a result, the 2026 grant request is structurally different from the 2025 requests, and should not be interpreted as a simple year-over-year continuation. Categories, cost centers, and strategic priorities were redefined in accordance with GOOSE-3.

This structural shift is reflected clearly in the composition of both Core and Growth funding. In 2025, the Core portion of the EGG captured a wide range of legacy commitments. In 2026, Core funding is deliberately narrowed to cover only protocol-critical functions: engineering, audits, validator operations, risk management, infrastructure, and essential G&A. This redefinition explains the sharp decline in Core baseline from $58.9M to $26.9M.

In EGG 2025, Growth spending was dominated by liquidity incentives and RewShare programs, with very limited allocations toward building new products. In contrast, EGG 2026 introduces product-oriented categories that did not exist in the 2025 structure. These include stVaults, Lido Earn, institutional integrations, launch of vertical expansion initiatives, and a structured discretionary pool tied to product performance milestones. This aligns directly with the GOOSE-3 mandate to scale new DAO revenue streams and evolve Lido from a single-product protocol into an organization with a diversified product portfolio.

Disclaimer
The figures, projections, and evaluations presented in this report are estimates only and should not be interpreted as financial promises, commitments, or guarantees of future performance. All forward-looking statements are based on current assumptions, market conditions, and available data, and are subject to significant uncertainties and potential changes. All metrics and projections should therefore be viewed as informational and indicative rather than definitive forecasts.

8 Likes

Snapshot vote started

We’re starting the Ecosystem Grant gRequest (EGG): Executing GOOSE-3 Snapshot, active till Fri, 19 Dec 2025 16:00:00 GMT. Please don’t forget to cast your vote!

Thank you for the detailed analysis of the current and future budgets.
It’s great that operating expenses have been significantly reduced – that’s a good optimization.

I have a couple of questions/clarifications:

  1. You write that buybacks are not included in the 2026 budget, even though the DAO adopted NEST in September for this purpose. While no specific decisions on buybacks were made, they weren’t put to a vote either – and I hope a vote will take place soon, which will impact the 2026 budget.

  2. You also say that the currently proposed buyback parameters would not be triggered under the conservative ETH price assumptions used in the model, but the current buyback scheme indicates this:

If the ETH price were to decline under 3000 or the USD revenue equivalent under $40 million, the buybacks would not be activated.

But total revenue expectations from staking are set at $45.3 million for 2026. I understand this may not be the final version, but it seems odd not to take the buyback into account if the decision on it is made in 2026.

  1. I also didn’t see any inclusion of revenue from the decision to convert Treasury Stablecoins into sUSDS or TMMFs. (Or tell me in which paragraph this is taken into account, I didn’t find it)

  2. General question: Since Lido earns money in ETH, maybe the entire budget should be restructured not by dollar, but by ETH?

5 Likes

Let me clarify part of your questions based on my general understanding

The 2026 Ecosystem Grant Request is a consolidated submission from the Lido Foundations, not a Lido DAO budget. It covers only the funding required for the Foundations’ operational and growth work. Buybacks however are a DAO-level mechanism executed according to rules approved by tokenholders, with any resulting LDO returned to the DAO Treasury.
That’s why I think that buybacks are not something that should appear in the Foundations’ Grant Request, even though they do require economic modelling and ongoing analysis in the future.

Regarding current progress:
The DAO has already supported the development of NEST v1, a module that enables the DAO to swap Treasury-held stETH into LDO through a single on-chain vote. That work is underway.

In parallel, a specific liquid buyback proposal is being discussed here. It is awaiting a dev team analysis and evaluation of the technical rails required for potential execution. The discussion is still in progress, and further updates will follow soon.

The conservative assumption used in the model is an ETH price of $2,712, which is below the $3,000 threshold defined in the current buyback proposal. Under that assumption, the buyback mechanism would not activate. It’s correct that the projected DAO revenue for 2026 is above the level that would allow buybacks. Btw, no conclusions should be made from the grant request proposal about whether buybacks will occur next year, when or in what form.

It’s included in the Comparison of 2025 Actuals and the Proposed 2026 EGG Request section - specifically in line marked [2.2], in the first table of that section.

6 Likes

Thank you, now everything is clear.

5 Likes

Thank you for the questions and comments.

Yes, the DAO’s revenue comes in ETH, but almost all grants (exception is incentives and revshare) are denominated in USD and changing that would be extremely difficult in practice. Grant request planning is partially based on concrete commitments, and those commitments are mostly made in USD. Different grant categories vary a lot in predictability, and tying them directly to ETH price volatility would make planning unreliable. That’s why the grant side is modeled in USD, while the ETH price assumption is applied only to revenue. Revenue is much more uniform and can tolerate this modelling approach; grants cannot.

1 Like

Since Lido Labs is currently the only company providing development and maintenance for the Lido protocol, the DAO doesn’t have many real options other than approving this proposal and accepting the requested budget, with little room for negotiation. That said, it’s still good to see a detailed breakdown of costs and clearly stated revenue goals in return.

The reduction in development costs compared to last year, and the effort to improve fiscal discipline, are positive signals and reflect Lido Labs’ intent to be more accountable.

Looking ahead, it would be valuable to have an independent party evaluating the efficiency of the DAO’s development spending to reduce trust assumptions.

As I understand it, returning any unused or excess budget is currently entirely dependent on the goodwill of Lido Labs. That introduces another trust assumption, especially given the size of the spending involved.

Since all committees are subgroups of Lido Labs, consolidating all budget proposals into a single one would improve transparency and make accountability easier.

Finally, the buyback program shouldn’t really be treated as an expense. It’s essentially a conversion of DAO assets into LDO tokens, which remain deployable if needed. The key distinction is that the DAO wouldn’t be spending genesis-allocated LDO, but rather its ongoing revenue, a very important difference.

2 Likes

Logically, you’re right, but the approach the Foundations use to access the approved funding maintains a fairly high level of accountability, in my view.

  1. The requested amount is not withdrawn from the Treasury all at once, but only as needed. Each transfer goes through Easy Track, which provides an additional layer of control for Lido DAO and the ability to object and block a release from the Treasury with a 5M LDO objection threshold.
  2. The Foundations are legally accountable to the DAO, which adds another layer of oversight.
4 Likes

Thanks for proposing this — structured support for executing aspects of Goose-3 is exactly the kind of ecosystem facilitation that can help bridge governance intent and practical outcomes.

One of the most important elements for any grant at this scale is clarity of expected deliverables and success criteria. Goose-3 itself encompasses multiple layers — strategy, tooling, and execution — and it would be helpful to understand how this grant scopes its contributions relative to the broader Goose-3 objectives. For example, are there clearly defined milestones tied to specific Goose-3 modules, timelines, and demonstration criteria that the community can independently verify?

Another aspect worth highlighting is incentive alignment and accountability. Grants can be powerful enablers, but without well-defined checkpoints and public reporting, it becomes harder for delegates and other stakeholders to assess whether progress is on track and in line with DAO expectations. Explicit expectations around intermediate reports, post-mortems, and any required open-source artifacts would build confidence.

Finally, I think it’s valuable to frame this not just as an execution grant, but as a learning and feedback mechanism for future phased rollouts. Goose-3 will likely continue to evolve, and documenting what works — and what doesn’t — could be as valuable as the immediate outputs themselves.

Overall, I’m supportive of the direction, conditional on clear milestones, reporting cadence, and alignment with Goose-3’s articulated goals.

2 Likes

There’s no independent financial control over Labs, but DAO can change the leadership in the organizations if it wants to. The directors are also limited to acting in accordance with Purpose and Principles.

That’s not true: the option to change the devco would quite nuclear expensive in terms of disruption, but it’s completely realistic. All the levers in the Lido protocol are under ultimate DAO control and a group of determined activist tokenholders can boot Lido Labs out and replace with a different devco. There’s also a much less disruptive option of changing the directors of Lido Labs, only changing the leadership but not the whole contractor structure, assets or outside relationships. I do not think it’s good option, obviously, but it is an option on the table that is thoroughly maintained through Lido protocol development.

It could be better for tokenholder to shop around between a bunch of equally competent, eager and motivated devcos (though it leaves an open question of long term vs short term relationships) but building even of these with sufficient level of knowledge and professionalism is not easy.

4 Likes

Thanks for the thoughtful feedback - the points around clarity, accountability, and learning loops are well taken.

Lido Labs is intentionally working toward making grant requests and expected outcomes as explicit as possible, so that evaluation by delegates and the broader community is straightforward. While there is always room for improvement, the process has been moving in the right direction year over year, and the current grant request reflects that progress.

On accountability, this feedback is a great point and will be an explicit action item for the next EGG cycle, with clearer mechanisms for community feedback and course correction. Looking ahead, the coming year will include quarterly tokenholder calls to discuss progress and learnings, as well as a yearly Goose/EGG report to assess outcomes before launching a new cycle.

1 Like

Snapshot vote ended

The Ecosystem Grant gRequest (EGG): Executing GOOSE-3 Snapshot vote concluded!
The results are:
Approve 2026 EGG: 56.7M LDO
Reject 2026 EGG: 0 LDO

:white_check_mark: Winning option: Approve 2026 EGG

1 Like